Skip to content

Conversation

@dr-orlovsky
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #336.

Will be un-drafted once the release is published.

@sanket1729 pls let me know will I need to squash the commits on update (they do not compile one-by-one, and I made them to simplify the review).

Copy link
Member

@sanket1729 sanket1729 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would like these to be squashed eventually.

If possible, you can add atomic patches here. But later open another PR with a single commit.

pub fn is_valid(&self) -> Result<(), PolicyError> {
self.check_timelocks()?;
self.check_duplicate_keys()?;
// self.check_duplicate_keys()?;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there any specific reason for this requirement to be removed?
This mainly concerns some algorithms the Tapscript Compiler #291 and #342 which might require changes.

@dr-orlovsky dr-orlovsky mentioned this pull request Apr 20, 2022
@dr-orlovsky
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing due to #359

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Update to bitcoin 0.28 release

3 participants