Skip to content

Conversation

@sanket1729
Copy link
Member

There found one bug in the current type system! The last commit disables the test while I work on fuzzer fix for rust-secp256k1.

@apoelstra
Copy link
Member

Can you rebase this? Github is confused and is still showing two commits from #257 in this.

@sanket1729
Copy link
Member Author

Rebased

@sanket1729
Copy link
Member Author

sanket1729 commented Sep 8, 2021

But this still has bugs, I am yet to address the changes to fuzz tests and removing the #[cfg(not(fuzzing))] thing
Ready for review again

@apoelstra
Copy link
Member

Do these tests need to be ignored? On my system they run in less than a second.

@sanket1729
Copy link
Member Author

No, these run really fast. I don't think the ignored is needed.

Fix bugs from alloy spec

Possibly has some bugs in j: wrapper implementation. Will squash this
commit later
Copy link
Member

@apoelstra apoelstra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK 003226e

@apoelstra apoelstra merged commit 8ad083a into rust-bitcoin:master Sep 13, 2021
heap-coder added a commit to heap-coder/rust-miniscript that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2025
…iniscript alloy spec

003226ee34cd13048eda165404bddda644a736be Add all tests from alloy spec (sanket1729)
0a7e9b4390befa8ac1582574f8db460c0bb2cc11 Add malleable test vectors (sanket1729)
f98ecbc8bfed7a60a039547e5d3d0c2ac458ca19 Add timelock tests (sanket1729)
e0af5b7c9164e5fcb3634ad0a6def2e34f02244d Don't enforce strict cannonical wrappers (sanket1729)

Pull request description:

  There found one bug in the current type system! The last commit disables the test while I work on fuzzer fix for rust-secp256k1.

ACKs for top commit:
  apoelstra:
    ACK 003226ee34cd13048eda165404bddda644a736be

Tree-SHA512: 399c8d2cc6c872d7c4a908809c492c495c04cbf59e757602f913fc11fb8d69ecb567da63a824faacfcf8dd0b116748c74ff4858ccb4e4d7c4444ce7bf6049481
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants