mkdocs: Values with special `!` syntax are set to null on mkdocs.yml

[j1elo]

Details

• Read the Docs project URL: https://readthedocs.org/projects/openvidu/
• Build URL (if applicable): https://readthedocs.org/projects/openvidu/builds/14834239/
• Read the Docs username (if applicable):

Our project is using:

• MkDocs 1.2.2

• Extra Context option in mkdocs.yml, with the ENV syntax to read environment variables, making the READTHEDOCS vars available to the template context:

  extra:
    READTHEDOCS: !ENV [READTHEDOCS, "(no var)"]
    READTHEDOCS_VERSION: !ENV [READTHEDOCS_VERSION, "(no var)"]
    READTHEDOCS_PROJECT: !ENV [READTHEDOCS_PROJECT, "(no var)"]
  

• Attempting to read the RtD environment variables as explained in Build environment and How do I change behavior when building with Read the Docs?.

Expected Result

1. The cat mkdocs.yml build step should show proper values for env vars READTHEDOCS, READTHEDOCS_VERSION, and READTHEDOCS_PROJECT.

2. A test html file with these contents:

   console.log("config.extra: {{ config.extra }}");
   console.log("config.extra.READTHEDOCS: {{ config.extra.READTHEDOCS }}");
   console.log("config.extra.READTHEDOCS_VERSION: {{ config.extra.READTHEDOCS_VERSION }}");
   

   should print something similar to this in the browser console:

   config.extra: {'READTHEDOCS': True, 'READTHEDOCS_VERSION': 1.2.3, 'READTHEDOCS_PROJECT': openvidu}
   config.extra.READTHEDOCS: True
   config.extra.READTHEDOCS_VERSION: 1.2.3
   

Actual Result

1. The cat mkdocs.yml build step shows that READTHEDOCS, READTHEDOCS_VERSION, and READTHEDOCS_PROJECT are all null:

   extra:
     READTHEDOCS: null
     READTHEDOCS_PROJECT: null
     READTHEDOCS_VERSION: null
   

2. The browser console shows this output:

   config.extra: {'READTHEDOCS': None, 'READTHEDOCS_PROJECT': None, 'READTHEDOCS_VERSION': None}
   config.extra.READTHEDOCS: None
   config.extra.READTHEDOCS_VERSION: None
   

Extra

Question / potential extra bug in the documentation: the technique shown in How do I change behavior when building with Read the Docs? would not really work with MkDocs, would it?

The sample is:

{% if READTHEDOCS %}
Woo
{% endif %}

but in MkDocs the READTHEDOCS is not directly available, is it expected to be? (sorry to ask here but is just a yes/no question that seems very relevant given the topic of the issue)

[humitos]

with the ENV syntax to read environment variables, making the READTHEDOCS vars available to the template context:

Reading that documentation, I arrived at https://github.com/waylan/pyyaml-env-tag#enabling-the-tag. It doesn't work on Read the Docs because we are using our own YAML parser for security reasons (

readthedocs.org/readthedocs/doc_builder/backends/mkdocs.py

Lines 347 to 363 in f0da2a4

	class SafeLoader(yaml.SafeLoader): # pylint: disable=too-many-ancestors
	"""
	Safe YAML loader.
	This loader parses special ``!!python/name:`` tags without actually
	importing or executing code. Every other special tag is ignored.
	Borrowed from https://stackoverflow.com/a/57121993
	Issue https://github.com/readthedocs/readthedocs.org/issues/7461
	"""
	def ignore_unknown(self, node): # pylint: disable=no-self-use, unused-argument
	return None
	def construct_python_name(self, suffix, node): # pylint: disable=no-self-use, unused-argument
	return ProxyPythonName(suffix)

) and the !ENV syntax is not recognized.

Unfortunately, I don't think there is a workaround, currently.

This may be solved by our "Future builders" (#8190) because we may not require a safe YAML loader when it gets implemented.

[j1elo]

Thank you for the feedback. So far I've been left with the only choice of loading the (otherwise undocumented!) script readthedocs-data.js, which is auto-generated by RTD MkDocs backend. This file exports a JS object with some values that I can use at run time, although I'd have preferred to have them at template build time.

This bring the next followup question, not sure if worth a separate bug report: why the RTD context injection is not working either? I was hoping to use that as alternative to the env vars, but the values don't resolve either and the build fails.

Seems to me that the general state of MkDocs support in RTD is pretty weak, as soon as you try to do anything beyond the most basic use cases; no problem with that, but I do believe that adding appropriate comments in some of these doc pages would save long hours of frustration to users (at least I know it would have for me...)

[humitos]

Hi @j1elo! Thanks for replying. You have mentioned here some interesting points that have been in our discussions lately but we haven't yet had the time to fix them.

Thank you for the feedback. So far I've been left with the only choice of loading the (otherwise undocumented!) script readthedocs-data.js

This is not documented on purpose because we don't expect users to use this data as it may change without communication. I don't think it has changed in years now. However, we can't compromise ourselves on that.

This bring the next followup question, not sure if worth a separate bug report: why the RTD context injection is not working either?

All the pages under /development/design/ are documents that we used to discuss proposed features. Some of them were never implemented --as the Theme Context that you just found 😞 . We have discussed not exposing these pages to users or moving them to a different set of documentation because we have already faced the confusion you are experimenting.

Seems to me that the general state of MkDocs support in RTD is pretty weak, as soon as you try to do anything beyond the most basic use cases

Unfortunately, this is true. Due to security restrictions, there are advanced MkDocs configurations that we cannot support currently and we haven't had the time to change our internal implementation to reduce those risks. For the !ENV case, we could use a similar solution than for !! in #7461

no problem with that, but I do believe that adding appropriate comments in some of these doc pages would save long hours of frustration to users (at least I know it would have for me...)

I'm sorry to read that. I hope we can clarify these limitations in our documentation. @astrojuanlu what do you think about mentioning that non-standard (or advanced) YAML usage is not supported currently?

[j1elo]

Thank you very much for the comprehensive answer! :)

Thank you for the feedback. So far I've been left with the only choice of loading the (otherwise undocumented!) script readthedocs-data.js

This is not documented on purpose because we don't expect users to use this data as it may change without communication. I don't think it has changed in years now. However, we can't compromise ourselves on that.

At the end of the day what I'm trying to do is make a small decision (to set <base href='/<Language>/<Version>/'> to the correct values in my HTML output... I know that's not ideal, but it's what I got in my hands right now), depending on the version that is being built. For that, my route was to try the Theme Context feature, then the Environment Variables, and lastly I ended up finding the existence of this script.

Are there any more alternatives that I could try with MkDocs? Otherwise, I'm willing to make the compromise of using a private RTD feature that is subject to change.

[astrojuanlu]

All the pages under /development/design/ are documents that we used to discuss proposed features. Some of them were never implemented --as the Theme Context that you just found 😞 . We have discussed not exposing these pages to users or moving them to a different set of documentation because we have already faced the confusion you are experimenting.

Do we have an issue for that already? Or are we only tracking it internally?

Besides, I think that design doc in particular has a confusing prose. It talks to "you" (the user) in a way a tutorial would do, and besides there is an admonition on top of https://docs.readthedocs.io/en/stable/guides/vcs.html that leads users into thinking that the new vision is already in place. I'll address this separately.

[j1elo]

Note for my future self or anyone with a similar need: Editing the <base> element after the fact with a JavaScript block (as was my intention here) is a very finicky thing to do. Resources will load first with the default base value, mostly giving 404s, then reload again with the modified base. So the only really decent solution is that <base href="..."> is already set correctly to start with, done from the templating engine.

This is my current solution. Very hacky, very ugly, very brittle. But that's the only thing that has worked so far. Only tested with the latest version...

<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">

<!--
Create a `<base>` element that matches the current RTD version.
There are 2 parts of the URL slug we need to get:
* Language.
* Version name. Something like "latest", "stable", "2.20.0", etc.
-->
{%- if config.extra.READTHEDOCS %}
    <!--
    This would be a nicer method to get the values. Load the RTD env vars into the MkDocs config,
    which itself gets passed by MkDocs into the Jinja's template context.
    However as of this writing, this method won't work.
    -->
    <base href="/{{ config.extra.READTHEDOCS_LANGUAGE }}/{{ config.extra.READTHEDOCS_VERSION }}/" />
{%- elif "doc.example.org" in config.site_url %}
    <!--
    Ugly Hack:
    * Language: Obtained from the theme's locale config.
    * Version name: RTD checks out the repo into a directory named like the
    version that is being built. So we get the version name from there.
    Sample `docs_dir` string for a build of the `latest` version:
    "/home/docs/checkouts/readthedocs.org/user_builds/openvidu/checkouts/latest/docs".
    -->
    <base href="/{{ config.theme.locale.language }}/{{ config.docs_dir.split('/')[-2] }}/" />
{%- else %}
    <!--
    When not deploying in our production subdomain, default to root.
    This is the case when using `mkdocs serve` for local authoring.
    -->
    <base href="/" />
{%- endif %}

Needless to say, it would be really nice if RTD ends up adding some of its build information to the context that gets passed to Jinja. Meanwhile, I sincerely wasn't able to find any solution that doesn't obtain the info in such indirect way.

Regardless, thank you all very much for your help and your support

[stale]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

[humitos]

I hope we can clarify these limitations in our documentation. @astrojuanlu what do you think about mentioning that non-standard (or advanced) YAML usage is not supported currently?

It seems this is the only actionable item from this issue for now. I'm marking it as accepted.