fix sql metrics for commands #1

cloud-fan · 2017-05-08T13:17:09Z

No description provided.

rdblue · 2017-05-08T23:53:03Z

Thanks! I'll look at this and add it to my PR as soon as I can.

## What changes were proposed in this pull request? There were two related fixes regarding `from_json`, `get_json_object` and `json_tuple` ([Fix #1](apache@c8803c0), [Fix #2](apache@86174ea)), but they weren't comprehensive it seems. I wanted to extend those fixes to all the parsers, and add tests for each case. ## How was this patch tested? Regression tests Author: Burak Yavuz <[email protected]> Closes apache#20302 from brkyvz/json-invfix.

## What changes were proposed in this pull request? Solved two bugs to enable stream-stream self joins. ### Incorrect analysis due to missing MultiInstanceRelation trait Streaming leaf nodes did not extend MultiInstanceRelation, which is necessary for the catalyst analyzer to convert the self-join logical plan DAG into a tree (by creating new instances of the leaf relations). This was causing the error `Failure when resolving conflicting references in Join:` (see JIRA for details). ### Incorrect attribute rewrite when splicing batch plans in MicroBatchExecution When splicing the source's batch plan into the streaming plan (by replacing the StreamingExecutionPlan), we were rewriting the attribute reference in the streaming plan with the new attribute references from the batch plan. This was incorrectly handling the scenario when multiple StreamingExecutionRelation point to the same source, and therefore eventually point to the same batch plan returned by the source. Here is an example query, and its corresponding plan transformations. ``` val df = input.toDF val join = df.select('value % 5 as "key", 'value).join( df.select('value % 5 as "key", 'value), "key") ``` Streaming logical plan before splicing the batch plan ``` Project [key#6, value#1, value#12] +- Join Inner, (key#6 = key#9) :- Project [(value#1 % 5) AS key#6, value#1] : +- StreamingExecutionRelation Memory[#1], value#1 +- Project [(value#12 % 5) AS key#9, value#12] +- StreamingExecutionRelation Memory[#1], value#12 // two different leaves pointing to same source ``` Batch logical plan after splicing the batch plan and before rewriting ``` Project [key#6, value#1, value#12] +- Join Inner, (key#6 = key#9) :- Project [(value#1 % 5) AS key#6, value#1] : +- LocalRelation [value#66] // replaces StreamingExecutionRelation Memory[#1], value#1 +- Project [(value#12 % 5) AS key#9, value#12] +- LocalRelation [value#66] // replaces StreamingExecutionRelation Memory[#1], value#12 ``` Batch logical plan after rewriting the attributes. Specifically, for spliced, the new output attributes (value#66) replace the earlier output attributes (value#12, and value#1, one for each StreamingExecutionRelation). ``` Project [key#6, value#66, value#66] // both value#1 and value#12 replaces by value#66 +- Join Inner, (key#6 = key#9) :- Project [(value#66 % 5) AS key#6, value#66] : +- LocalRelation [value#66] +- Project [(value#66 % 5) AS key#9, value#66] +- LocalRelation [value#66] ``` This causes the optimizer to eliminate value#66 from one side of the join. ``` Project [key#6, value#66, value#66] +- Join Inner, (key#6 = key#9) :- Project [(value#66 % 5) AS key#6, value#66] : +- LocalRelation [value#66] +- Project [(value#66 % 5) AS key#9] // this does not generate value, incorrect join results +- LocalRelation [value#66] ``` **Solution**: Instead of rewriting attributes, use a Project to introduce aliases between the output attribute references and the new reference generated by the spliced plans. The analyzer and optimizer will take care of the rest. ``` Project [key#6, value#1, value#12] +- Join Inner, (key#6 = key#9) :- Project [(value#1 % 5) AS key#6, value#1] : +- Project [value#66 AS value#1] // solution: project with aliases : +- LocalRelation [value#66] +- Project [(value#12 % 5) AS key#9, value#12] +- Project [value#66 AS value#12] // solution: project with aliases +- LocalRelation [value#66] ``` ## How was this patch tested? New unit test Author: Tathagata Das <[email protected]> Closes apache#20598 from tdas/SPARK-23406.

## What changes were proposed in this pull request? There were two related fixes regarding `from_json`, `get_json_object` and `json_tuple` ([Fix #1](apache@c8803c0), [Fix #2](apache@86174ea)), but they weren't comprehensive it seems. I wanted to extend those fixes to all the parsers, and add tests for each case. ## How was this patch tested? Regression tests Author: Burak Yavuz <[email protected]> Closes apache#20302 from brkyvz/json-invfix. (cherry picked from commit e01919e) Signed-off-by: hyukjinkwon <[email protected]>

This is a backport of apache#20598. ## What changes were proposed in this pull request? Solved two bugs to enable stream-stream self joins. ### Incorrect analysis due to missing MultiInstanceRelation trait Streaming leaf nodes did not extend MultiInstanceRelation, which is necessary for the catalyst analyzer to convert the self-join logical plan DAG into a tree (by creating new instances of the leaf relations). This was causing the error `Failure when resolving conflicting references in Join:` (see JIRA for details). ### Incorrect attribute rewrite when splicing batch plans in MicroBatchExecution When splicing the source's batch plan into the streaming plan (by replacing the StreamingExecutionPlan), we were rewriting the attribute reference in the streaming plan with the new attribute references from the batch plan. This was incorrectly handling the scenario when multiple StreamingExecutionRelation point to the same source, and therefore eventually point to the same batch plan returned by the source. Here is an example query, and its corresponding plan transformations. ``` val df = input.toDF val join = df.select('value % 5 as "key", 'value).join( df.select('value % 5 as "key", 'value), "key") ``` Streaming logical plan before splicing the batch plan ``` Project [key#6, value#1, value#12] +- Join Inner, (key#6 = key#9) :- Project [(value#1 % 5) AS key#6, value#1] : +- StreamingExecutionRelation Memory[#1], value#1 +- Project [(value#12 % 5) AS key#9, value#12] +- StreamingExecutionRelation Memory[#1], value#12 // two different leaves pointing to same source ``` Batch logical plan after splicing the batch plan and before rewriting ``` Project [key#6, value#1, value#12] +- Join Inner, (key#6 = key#9) :- Project [(value#1 % 5) AS key#6, value#1] : +- LocalRelation [value#66] // replaces StreamingExecutionRelation Memory[#1], value#1 +- Project [(value#12 % 5) AS key#9, value#12] +- LocalRelation [value#66] // replaces StreamingExecutionRelation Memory[#1], value#12 ``` Batch logical plan after rewriting the attributes. Specifically, for spliced, the new output attributes (value#66) replace the earlier output attributes (value#12, and value#1, one for each StreamingExecutionRelation). ``` Project [key#6, value#66, value#66] // both value#1 and value#12 replaces by value#66 +- Join Inner, (key#6 = key#9) :- Project [(value#66 % 5) AS key#6, value#66] : +- LocalRelation [value#66] +- Project [(value#66 % 5) AS key#9, value#66] +- LocalRelation [value#66] ``` This causes the optimizer to eliminate value#66 from one side of the join. ``` Project [key#6, value#66, value#66] +- Join Inner, (key#6 = key#9) :- Project [(value#66 % 5) AS key#6, value#66] : +- LocalRelation [value#66] +- Project [(value#66 % 5) AS key#9] // this does not generate value, incorrect join results +- LocalRelation [value#66] ``` **Solution**: Instead of rewriting attributes, use a Project to introduce aliases between the output attribute references and the new reference generated by the spliced plans. The analyzer and optimizer will take care of the rest. ``` Project [key#6, value#1, value#12] +- Join Inner, (key#6 = key#9) :- Project [(value#1 % 5) AS key#6, value#1] : +- Project [value#66 AS value#1] // solution: project with aliases : +- LocalRelation [value#66] +- Project [(value#12 % 5) AS key#9, value#12] +- Project [value#66 AS value#12] // solution: project with aliases +- LocalRelation [value#66] ``` ## How was this patch tested? New unit test Author: Tathagata Das <[email protected]> Closes apache#20765 from tdas/SPARK-23406-2.3.

…te temporary path in local staging directory ## What changes were proposed in this pull request? Th environment of my cluster as follows: ``` OS:Linux version 2.6.32-220.7.1.el6.x86_64 (mockbuildc6b18n3.bsys.dev.centos.org) (gcc version 4.4.6 20110731 (Red Hat 4.4.6-3) (GCC) ) #1 SMP Wed Mar 7 00:52:02 GMT 2012 Hadoop: 2.7.2 Spark: 2.3.0 or 3.0.0(master branch) Hive: 1.2.1 ``` My spark run on deploy mode yarn-client. If I execute the SQL `insert overwrite local directory '/home/test/call_center/' select * from call_center`, a HiveException will appear as follows: `Caused by: org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.metadata.HiveException: java.io.IOException: Mkdirs failed to create file:/home/xitong/hive/stagingdir_hive_2019-02-19_17-31-00_678_1816816774691551856-1/-ext-10000/_temporary/0/_temporary/attempt_20190219173233_0002_m_000000_3 (exists=false, cwd=file:/data10/yarn/nm-local-dir/usercache/xitong/appcache/application_1543893582405_6126857/container_e124_1543893582405_6126857_01_000011) at org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.io.HiveFileFormatUtils.getHiveRecordWriter(HiveFileFormatUtils.java:249)` Current spark sql generate a local temporary path in local staging directory.The schema of local temporary path start with `file`, so the HiveException appears. This PR change the local temporary path to HDFS temporary path, and use DistributedFileSystem instance copy the data from HDFS temporary path to local directory. If Spark run on local deploy mode, 'insert overwrite local directory' works fine. ## How was this patch tested? UT cannot support yarn-client mode.The test is in my product environment. Closes apache#23841 from beliefer/fix-bug-of-insert-overwrite-local-dir. Authored-by: gengjiaan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <[email protected]>

## What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR supports `OpenJ9` in addition to `IBM JDK` and `OpenJDK` in Spark by handling `System.getProperty("java.vendor") = "Eclipse OpenJ9"`. In `inferDefaultMemory()` and `getKrb5LoginModuleName()`, this PR uses non `IBM` way. ``` $ ~/jdk-11.0.2+9_openj9-0.12.1/bin/jshell | Welcome to JShell -- Version 11.0.2 | For an introduction type: /help intro jshell> System.out.println(System.getProperty("java.vendor")) Eclipse OpenJ9 jshell> System.out.println(System.getProperty("java.vm.info")) JRE 11 Linux amd64-64-Bit Compressed References 20190204_127 (JIT enabled, AOT enabled) OpenJ9 - 90dd8cb40 OMR - d2f4534b JCL - 289c70b6844 based on jdk-11.0.2+9 jshell> System.out.println(Class.forName("com.ibm.lang.management.OperatingSystemMXBean").getDeclaredMethod("getTotalPhysicalMemory")) public abstract long com.ibm.lang.management.OperatingSystemMXBean.getTotalPhysicalMemory() jshell> System.out.println(Class.forName("com.sun.management.OperatingSystemMXBean").getDeclaredMethod("getTotalPhysicalMemorySize")) public abstract long com.sun.management.OperatingSystemMXBean.getTotalPhysicalMemorySize() jshell> System.out.println(Class.forName("com.ibm.security.auth.module.Krb5LoginModule")) | Exception java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com.ibm.security.auth.module.Krb5LoginModule | at Class.forNameImpl (Native Method) | at Class.forName (Class.java:339) | at (#1:1) jshell> System.out.println(Class.forName("com.sun.security.auth.module.Krb5LoginModule")) class com.sun.security.auth.module.Krb5LoginModule ``` ## How was this patch tested? Existing test suites Manual testing with OpenJ9. Closes apache#24308 from kiszk/SPARK-27397. Authored-by: Kazuaki Ishizaki <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <[email protected]>

…comparison assertions ## What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR removes a few hardware-dependent assertions which can cause a failure in `aarch64`. **x86_64** ``` rootdonotdel-openlab-allinone-l00242678:/home/ubuntu# uname -a Linux donotdel-openlab-allinone-l00242678 4.4.0-154-generic apache#181-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jun 25 05:29:03 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux scala> import java.lang.Float.floatToRawIntBits import java.lang.Float.floatToRawIntBits scala> floatToRawIntBits(0.0f/0.0f) res0: Int = -4194304 scala> floatToRawIntBits(Float.NaN) res1: Int = 2143289344 ``` **aarch64** ``` [rootarm-huangtianhua spark]# uname -a Linux arm-huangtianhua 4.14.0-49.el7a.aarch64 #1 SMP Tue Apr 10 17:22:26 UTC 2018 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux scala> import java.lang.Float.floatToRawIntBits import java.lang.Float.floatToRawIntBits scala> floatToRawIntBits(0.0f/0.0f) res1: Int = 2143289344 scala> floatToRawIntBits(Float.NaN) res2: Int = 2143289344 ``` ## How was this patch tested? Pass the Jenkins (This removes the test coverage). Closes apache#25186 from huangtianhua/special-test-case-for-aarch64. Authored-by: huangtianhua <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>

### What changes were proposed in this pull request? `org.apache.spark.sql.kafka010.KafkaDelegationTokenSuite` failed lately. After had a look at the logs it just shows the following fact without any details: ``` Caused by: sbt.ForkMain$ForkError: sun.security.krb5.KrbException: Server not found in Kerberos database (7) - Server not found in Kerberos database ``` Since the issue is intermittent and not able to reproduce it we should add more debug information and wait for reproduction with the extended logs. ### Why are the changes needed? Failing test doesn't give enough debug information. ### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? I've started the test manually and checked that such additional debug messages show up: ``` >>> KrbApReq: APOptions are 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 >>> EType: sun.security.krb5.internal.crypto.Aes128CtsHmacSha1EType Looking for keys for: kafka/localhostEXAMPLE.COM Added key: 17version: 0 Added key: 23version: 0 Added key: 16version: 0 Found unsupported keytype (3) for kafka/localhostEXAMPLE.COM >>> EType: sun.security.krb5.internal.crypto.Aes128CtsHmacSha1EType Using builtin default etypes for permitted_enctypes default etypes for permitted_enctypes: 17 16 23. >>> EType: sun.security.krb5.internal.crypto.Aes128CtsHmacSha1EType MemoryCache: add 1571936500/174770/16C565221B70AAB2BEFE31A83D13A2F4/client/localhostEXAMPLE.COM to client/localhostEXAMPLE.COM|kafka/localhostEXAMPLE.COM MemoryCache: Existing AuthList: #3: 1571936493/200803/8CD70D280B0862C5DA1FF901ECAD39FE/client/localhostEXAMPLE.COM #2: 1571936499/985009/BAD33290D079DD4E3579A8686EC326B7/client/localhostEXAMPLE.COM #1: 1571936499/995208/B76B9D78A9BE283AC78340157107FD40/client/localhostEXAMPLE.COM ``` Closes apache#26252 from gaborgsomogyi/SPARK-29580. Authored-by: Gabor Somogyi <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>

### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Currently the join operators are not well abstracted, since there are lot of common logic. A trait can be created for easier pattern matching and other future handiness. This is a follow-up PR based on comment apache#27509 (comment) . This PR refined from the following aspects: 1. Refined structure of all physical join operators 2. Add missing joinType field for CartesianProductExec operator 3. Refined codes related to Explain Formatted The EXPLAIN FORMATTED changes are 1. Converge all join operator `verboseStringWithOperatorId` implementations to `BaseJoinExec`. Join condition displayed, and join keys displayed if it’s not empty. 2. `#1` will add Join condition to `BroadcastNestedLoopJoinExec`. 3. `#1` will **NOT** affect `CartesianProductExec`,`SortMergeJoin` and `HashJoin`s, since they already got there override implementation before. 4. Converge all join operator `simpleStringWithNodeId` to `BaseJoinExec`, which will enhance the one line description for `CartesianProductExec` with `JoinType` added. 5. Override `simpleStringWithNodeId` in `BroadcastNestedLoopJoinExec` to show `BuildSide`, which was only done for `HashJoin`s before. ### Why are the changes needed? Make the code consistent with other operators and for future handiness of join operators. ### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? Existing tests Closes apache#27595 from Eric5553/RefineJoin. Authored-by: Eric Wu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]>

… correctly ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR proposes: 1. `CREATE OR REPLACE TEMP VIEW USING` should use `TemporaryViewRelation` to store temp views. 2. By doing #1, it fixes the issue where the temp view being replaced is not uncached. ### Why are the changes needed? This is a part of an ongoing work to wrap all the temporary views with `TemporaryViewRelation`: [SPARK-34698](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-34698). This also fixes a bug where the temp view being replaced is not uncached. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? Yes, the temp view being replaced with `CREATE OR REPLACE TEMP VIEW USING` is correctly uncached if the temp view is cached. ### How was this patch tested? Added new tests. Closes apache#31825 from imback82/create_temp_view_using. Authored-by: Terry Kim <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]>

fix sql metrics for commands

fb9bf06

cloud-fan mentioned this pull request May 9, 2017

[SPARK-20213][SQL][UI] Fix DataFrameWriter operations in SQL UI tab. apache/spark#17540

Closed

cloud-fan closed this May 31, 2017

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

fix sql metrics for commands #1

fix sql metrics for commands #1

Uh oh!

cloud-fan commented May 8, 2017

Uh oh!

rdblue commented May 8, 2017

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

fix sql metrics for commands #1

fix sql metrics for commands #1

Uh oh!

Conversation

cloud-fan commented May 8, 2017

Uh oh!

rdblue commented May 8, 2017

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants