Skip to content

Revamping our classification models docs #5833

@NicolasHug

Description

@NicolasHug

We're re-writing our models docs to make them clearer, simpler, and to properly document the upcoming multi-weight API. This issue is about adding docs for the classification models.

Perhaps this is something @oke-aditya @YosuaMichael @lezwon @zhiqwang would be interested in :) ?

Our latest new docs are currently here (this link is likely outdated by the time you look at it, but it doesn't matter; the skeleton is there). We created a separate section that will eventually be merged into the main one. We have documented a few models, but most of them are still missing. The list of models that still need docs is listed below. If you'd like to participate, please comment below with a message saying "I'm working on XYZ" where XYZ is a model, so that others don't pick the same as you do. To keep things simple, please submit one PR per model, but feel free to contribute more than one model.

How to write docs for a model

Note: below are detailed instructions. This makes it look more complicated than it actually is. Don't be scared!

A great place to start is to look a the changes in this PR that documents SqueezeNet. You'll need to do exactly the same for your model:

To build the docs locally, please look at our contributing guide. You won't need to worry about the gallery example, so always use make html-noplot instead of make html to save time.

Please don't hesitate to ping us if you need any help / guidance or if you have any question!


Classification models that need docs are:

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions