Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 10, 2025. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@Nayef211
Copy link
Contributor

@Nayef211 Nayef211 commented Jul 6, 2022

Description

@Nayef211 Nayef211 requested review from parmeet and vcm2114 July 6, 2022 03:10
@Nayef211 Nayef211 marked this pull request as ready for review July 6, 2022 03:10
Copy link
Contributor

@parmeet parmeet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks for providing the temporary fix. Although i am bit concerned changing the hash for test dataset (not sure what leads to this change), let's go ahead with this change to make the dataset usable.

@Nayef211
Copy link
Contributor Author

Nayef211 commented Jul 6, 2022

LGTM, thanks for providing the temporary fix. Although i am bit concerned changing the hash for test dataset (not sure what leads to this change), let's go ahead with this change to make the dataset usable.

@parmeet I was wondering the same thing but unfortunately I am not able to compare this test split against the test split of the original dataset as I don't have it readily available 😞

@Nayef211 Nayef211 merged commit c7e5a07 into pytorch:main Jul 6, 2022
@Nayef211 Nayef211 deleted the hotfix/multi30k_url_update branch July 6, 2022 17:17
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Multi30K dataset link is broken

3 participants