Skip to content

Conversation

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Jan 20, 2018

The suggested replacement for print statements previously failed to account
for leading whitespace and hence could end up including unwanted text in
the proposed call to the print builtin.

Patch by Sanyam Khurana.
(cherry picked from commit d57f26c)

https://bugs.python.org/issue32028

The suggested replacement for print statements previously failed to account
for leading whitespace and hence could end up including unwanted text in
the proposed call to the print builtin.

Patch by Sanyam Khurana.
(cherry picked from commit d57f26c)
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@CuriousLearner and @ncoghlan: Backport status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@ncoghlan ncoghlan merged commit 4002d5d into python:3.6 Jan 20, 2018
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks, @ncoghlan!

@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-d57f26c-3.6 branch January 20, 2018 03:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants