Skip to content

[3.10] bpo-42982: Improve the text on suggested number of iterations of PBKDF2 (GH-24276) #30951

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 27, 2022
Merged

[3.10] bpo-42982: Improve the text on suggested number of iterations of PBKDF2 (GH-24276) #30951

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 27, 2022

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Jan 27, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Less specific number wording (as there is no one right number - the old 100k is too big for some applications and woefully small for others). We now link to NIST SP 800-132 to tell people what to read in there on how to decide for their application.

Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith [email protected] [Google]
(cherry picked from commit 897ce90)

Co-authored-by: Illia Volochii [email protected]

https://bugs.python.org/issue42982

Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:gpshead

@illia-v @miss-islington
bpo-42982: Improve the text on suggested number of iterations of PBKD…
5998c02 
…F2 (pythonGH-24276)

Less specific number wording (as there is no one right number - the old 100k is too big for some applications and woefully small for others). We now link to NIST SP 800-132 to tell people what to read in there on how to decide for their application.

Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <[email protected]> [Google]
(cherry picked from commit 897ce90)

Co-authored-by: Illia Volochii <[email protected]>
@miss-islington miss-islington requested a review from tiran as a code owner January 27, 2022 08:39
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added the docs Documentation in the Doc dir label Jan 27, 2022
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot mentioned this pull request Jan 27, 2022
Merged
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@illia-v and @gpshead: Status check is done, and it's a failure ❌ .

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@illia-v and @gpshead: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@illia-v and @gpshead: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit 1ecc98d into python:3.10 Jan 27, 2022
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-897ce90-3.10 branch January 27, 2022 09:02
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@illia-v and @gpshead: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@gpshead gpshead gpshead approved these changes

@tiran tiran Awaiting requested review from tiran tiran is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@miss-islington @gpshead @the-knights-who-say-ni @bedevere-bot @illia-v