Skip to content

Conversation

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Nov 13, 2021

  • bpo-45772: socket.socket should be a class instead of a function

Currently socket.socket is documented as a function, but it is really
a class (and thus has function-like usage to construct an object). This
correction would ensure that Python projects that are interlinking
Python's documentation can properly locate socket.socket as a type.
(cherry picked from commit 4c792f3)

Co-authored-by: Hong Xu [email protected]

https://bugs.python.org/issue45772

Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:asvetlov

…honGH-23960)

* bpo-45772: socket.socket should be a class instead of a function

Currently `socket.socket` is documented as a function, but it is really
a class (and thus has function-like usage to construct an object). This
correction would ensure that Python projects that are interlinking
Python's documentation can properly locate `socket.socket` as a type.
(cherry picked from commit 4c792f3)

Co-authored-by: Hong Xu <[email protected]>
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@xuhdev and @asvetlov: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@xuhdev and @asvetlov: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry, I can't merge this PR. Reason: You're not authorized to push to this branch. Visit https://docs.github.com/articles/about-protected-branches/ for more information..

@asvetlov asvetlov closed this Nov 13, 2021
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-4c792f3-3.8 branch November 13, 2021 06:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

awaiting merge docs Documentation in the Doc dir

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants