Skip to content

Conversation

mdboom
Copy link
Contributor

@mdboom mdboom commented Sep 13, 2023

Copy link
Member

@brandtbucher brandtbucher left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, just one suggestion to maybe improve the funny ratio_to_float function. It's minor, though, so I'll merge tomorrow regardless.

Comment on lines 30 to 38
def ratio_to_float(s):
"""
The inverse of format_ratio.
"""
if s == "":
return 0.0
else:
return float(s[:-1])

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This confused me, because it's not the inverse, right? It just turns "4.2%" into 4.2 (which feels wrong to me since I'd expect .042... I know that this is what the old code does, and it's only used as a sort key, so I guess either is fine).

So I'd suggest changing the name and docstring, but I honestly can't think of a good name for this operation...

At least, if this is gonna be its own function, maybe assert s.endswith("%") so it's clear what this function is doing?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point. I renamed the function and clarified in the docstring.

stats[key] += value
stats['__nfiles__'] += 1

import opcode
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just curious, why was this import moved here? Just to reduce the temptation to use it elsewhere in the file?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, exactly. Any use of opcode, dis or other sorts of bytecode introspection things on the "compare two results" path could lead to a subtle, silent error. I'll add a comment.

@mdboom mdboom requested a review from brandtbucher September 15, 2023 13:44
@brandtbucher brandtbucher merged commit 19f5eff into python:main Sep 15, 2023
csm10495 pushed a commit to csm10495/cpython that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants