Skip to content

Conversation

pablogsal
Copy link
Member

@pablogsal pablogsal commented Jul 22, 2023

Copy link
Member

@lysnikolaou lysnikolaou left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good after @Gobot1234's comment has been addressed! Great improvement! 🚀

Copy link
Member

@lysnikolaou lysnikolaou left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't see all the test failures. Most of them are about grammar errors or tests about using async/await as soft keywords. @pablogsal Would you like me to take a deeper look into them?

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

When you're done making the requested changes, leave the comment: I have made the requested changes; please review again.

@pablogsal pablogsal requested a review from JelleZijlstra as a code owner July 25, 2023 15:40
@pablogsal
Copy link
Member Author

@lysnikolaou I have updated the tests in a separate commit. Please, review again

@pablogsal
Copy link
Member Author

I have made the requested changes; please review again

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

Thanks for making the requested changes!

@lysnikolaou: please review the changes made to this pull request.

@lysnikolaou
Copy link
Member

lysnikolaou commented Jul 25, 2023

Changes to the tests look good. Let's wait for all the tests to pass and merge! Thanks!

@pablogsal pablogsal merged commit da8f87b into python:main Jul 26, 2023
@pablogsal pablogsal deleted the gh-107015 branch July 26, 2023 15:34
jtcave pushed a commit to jtcave/cpython that referenced this pull request Jul 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants