Skip to content

Conversation

JustAnotherArchivist
Copy link
Contributor

The parameter name was changed from sequence to iterable in commit d11ae5d. However, when the equivalent code snippet was added a couple of years later in commits 690d4ae / 9028928, it accidentally used the old name.

Trivial docs change, no issue exists, and no news entry needed.

The parameter name was changed from `sequence` to `iterable` in commit d11ae5d. However, when the equivalent code snippet was added a couple of years later in commits 690d4ae/90289281, it accidentally used the old name.
@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added awaiting review docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news labels Jan 14, 2023
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @JustAnotherArchivist for the PR, and @rhettinger for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.11.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-101030 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.11 branch.

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the needs backport to 3.11 only security fixes label Jan 14, 2023
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2023
…honGH-101029)

(cherry picked from commit ef633e5)

Co-authored-by: JustAnotherArchivist <[email protected]>
kumaraditya303 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2023
…e` (GH-101029) (#101030)

Sync-up parameter name in equivalent code snippet of `enumerate` (GH-101029)
(cherry picked from commit ef633e5)

Co-authored-by: JustAnotherArchivist <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip issue skip news

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants