Add default swagger filename to Api.

[ProgHaj]

This PR suggests a fix for issue #191:

• Add default_swagger_filename parameter to restx's api.py instead of hardcoding it.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #192 (866028f) into master (e1ab7e3) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Current head 866028f differs from pull request most recent head 037fe95. Consider uploading reports for the commit 037fe95 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #192      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   96.86%   96.88%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          20       20              
  Lines        2740     2725      -15     
==========================================
- Hits         2654     2640      -14     
+ Misses         86       85       -1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
flask_restx/api.py	96.69% <100.00%> (-0.07%)	⬇️
flask_restx/resource.py	97.95% <0.00%> (-0.12%)	⬇️
flask_restx/fields.py	96.64% <0.00%> (+0.19%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e1ab7e3...037fe95. Read the comment docs.

[karunpoudel-chr]

lgtm

[ziirish]

Hello,

Thanks for your contribution.

Although the code coverage remains unchanged would you mind adding a unit test since you introduce a new option?

[ProgHaj]

Hello and thank you for the feedback!

I added a test for a non-default swagger name to test_swagger.py.
I wasn't quite sure if it should've been added to test_swagger or test_api.

[ProgHaj]

Hello!

I rebased it to latest again, without any failing tests.

[nfickas]

@ziirish Is there anything we can do to get this merge request moving?

[nfickas]

@j5awry this is something that could immensely help out my team, are you able to review this? If not, who's someone that can?

[j5awry]

Sorry for letting this sit. The change and test look good. If it could be given a quick rebase, that'd be helpful. thanks!

[ProgHaj]

@j5awry sorry for the delay, just rebased!

[lyonsaj]

@j5awry Is there an update on this being released?