Skip to content

Using GetHub Actions instead of Travis CI #23

@SVilgelm

Description

@SVilgelm

I would like to make a proposal to use GitHub Actions instead of Travis CI.
In my opinion and from my experience, the GitHub Actions works better and a bit faster than Travis CI.
The most important enhancement is that everything is stored on the GitHub.
GitHub workflows allows to test on Linux, Mac and Windows VMs for free for the open source projects.
All developers can test their code in their forks just pushing a code into a brach, open the actions (in there fork, not here) and see the results.

Examples of the Push and Pull Request checks are here: https://github.com/SVilgelm/flask-restx/pull/3/checks
it's a PR to master branch in my fork.

Example of the release workflow: https://github.com/SVilgelm/flask-restx/runs/410117918?check_suite_focus=true
and the pypi: https://pypi.org/project/flask-restx-svilgelm-test/99.99.99/

So, let's discuss.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions