Skip to content

Conversation

@bluetech
Copy link
Member

3.7 is EOL.

Copy link
Member

@RonnyPfannschmidt RonnyPfannschmidt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks 👍

@RonnyPfannschmidt RonnyPfannschmidt merged commit c0f794a into pytest-dev:master Feb 24, 2024
@bluetech bluetech deleted the rm-py37 branch February 24, 2024 10:33
zmedico added a commit to zmedico/pytest-xdist that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2024
Use the execnet main_thread_only execmodel so that code which expects
to run in the main thread will just work.  This execmodel has been
proposed in pytest-dev/execnet#243, so this
patch should not be merged until there is a release version of execnet
supporting the main_thread_only execmodel.

Also increase minimum python version to 3.8 since execnet dropped 3.7
support in pytest-dev/execnet#245.
zmedico added a commit to zmedico/pytest-xdist that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2024
Use the execnet main_thread_only execmodel so that code which expects
to run in the main thread will just work.  This execmodel has been
merged to the execnet master branch via pytest-dev/execnet#243, so this
patch should not be merged until there is a released version of execnet
supporting the main_thread_only execmodel.

Also increase minimum python version to 3.8 since execnet dropped 3.7
support in pytest-dev/execnet#245.

Closes: pytest-dev#620
zmedico added a commit to zmedico/pytest-xdist that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2024
Use the execnet main_thread_only execmodel so that code which expects
to run in the main thread will just work.  This execmodel has been
merged to the execnet master branch via pytest-dev/execnet#243, so this
patch should not be merged until there is a released version of execnet
supporting the main_thread_only execmodel.

Also increase minimum python version to 3.8 since execnet dropped 3.7
support in pytest-dev/execnet#245.

Closes: pytest-dev#620
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants