Skip to content

Conversation

@jacobtylerwalls
Copy link
Member

Type of Changes

Type
βœ“ πŸ”¨ Refactoring

Description

The primer messages for sentry are pretty noisy, which is usually a symptom of some headache in the inference cache. They all seem to be in no-name-from-module. I couldn't reproduce locally, but I'm hoping avoiding some unnecessary inference here will help.

See #9419 (comment)

@jacobtylerwalls jacobtylerwalls added primer Skip news πŸ”‡ This change does not require a changelog entry performance labels Feb 10, 2024
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 10, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests βœ…

Comparison is base (659a32f) 95.80% compared to head (b8f2efa) 95.80%.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #9428   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.80%   95.80%           
=======================================
  Files         173      173           
  Lines       18776    18778    +2     
=======================================
+ Hits        17989    17991    +2     
  Misses        787      787           
Files Coverage Ξ”
pylint/checkers/variables.py 97.25% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

πŸ€– According to the primer, this change has no effect on the checked open source code. πŸ€–πŸŽ‰

This comment was generated for commit b8f2efa

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

performance primer Skip news πŸ”‡ This change does not require a changelog entry

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants