Skip to content

Conversation

@rwgk
Copy link
Collaborator

@rwgk rwgk commented Nov 1, 2022

Description

Quoting from

https://docs.python.org/3/library/multiprocessing.html#contexts-and-start-methods

  • fork

    ... Note that safely forking a multithreaded process is problematic.

    Available on Unix only. The default on Unix.

The idea to try "spawn" is the result of deadlock debugging. After reviewing tracebacks @jbms wrote:

This actually looks like a general fork thread-safety issue, not related to pybind11. Using fork in a multithreaded program is generally not safe.

Suggested changelog entry:

Quoting from

https://docs.python.org/3/library/multiprocessing.html#contexts-and-start-methods

* fork

  ... Note that safely forking a multithreaded process is problematic.

  Available on Unix only. The default on Unix.

The idea to try `"spawn"` is the result of deadlock debugging. After reviewing tracebacks @jbms wrote:

> This actually looks like a general fork thread-safety issues, not related to pybind11
> Using fork in a multithreaded program is generally not safe
@rwgk
Copy link
Collaborator Author

rwgk commented Nov 1, 2022

Works! That's one way to get rid of the deadlocks (hoping this will do the trick). But I'll try "forkserver", too, in another PR.

rwgk added a commit to rwgk/pybind11 that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2022
…similar to pybind#4306, the only difference between the two PRs is the `"spawn"` vs `"forkserver"` argument).
rwgk added a commit to rwgk/pybind11 that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2022
rwgk added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2022
* Use `multiprocessing` `start_method` `"forkserver"`

Alternative to PR #4305

* Add link to comment under PR #4105

* Unconditionally `pytest.skip("DEADLOCK")` for PyPy Windows

* Remove `SKIP_IF_DEADLOCK` entirely, for simplicity. Hopefully this PR will resolve the deadlocks for good.

* Add "In a nutshell" comment, in response to request by @EricCousineau-TRI
@rwgk
Copy link
Collaborator Author

rwgk commented Nov 23, 2022

This PR was made obsolete by #4306.

@rwgk rwgk closed this Nov 23, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant