-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
Open
Labels
ci flakeKnown CI issues. Failures on CI should be recorded in an issue, but not block PRs.Known CI issues. Failures on CI should be recorded in an issue, but not block PRs.
Description
Not sure what's going on, but this test failed again on 3.9, completely unrelated to the actual changes.
I don't know what that test is about, but I thought I'd log it.
Do we have a race condition? Does CPython 3.9 have a race condition?
__________________ test_python_to_cpp_to_python_from_process ___________________
def test_python_to_cpp_to_python_from_process():
"""Makes sure there is no GIL deadlock when using processes.
This test is for completion, but it was never an issue.
"""
> assert _run_in_process(_python_to_cpp_to_python) == 0
E assert -11 == 0
E + where -11 = _run_in_process(_python_to_cpp_to_python)
test_gil_scoped.py:81: AssertionError
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
ci flakeKnown CI issues. Failures on CI should be recorded in an issue, but not block PRs.Known CI issues. Failures on CI should be recorded in an issue, but not block PRs.