test: Remove place_agent duplicate warnings

[rht]

Because of #2083, some faulty test code have been caught. cc: @puer-robustus

[github-actions]

Performance benchmarks:

Model	Size	Init time [95% CI]	Run time [95% CI]
Schelling	small	🔵 +0.0% [-0.3%, +0.4%]	🔵 -0.1% [-0.3%, +0.1%]
Schelling	large	🔵 -0.2% [-0.8%, +0.3%]	🔵 +0.6% [+0.2%, +0.9%]
WolfSheep	small	🔵 +0.1% [-0.7%, +0.9%]	🔵 +0.1% [-0.2%, +0.3%]
WolfSheep	large	🔵 -0.1% [-0.5%, +0.2%]	🔵 -0.3% [-0.5%, -0.1%]
BoidFlockers	small	🔵 +0.1% [-0.4%, +0.7%]	🔵 +0.7% [+0.1%, +1.4%]
BoidFlockers	large	🔵 +0.6% [+0.3%, +0.9%]	🔵 +1.1% [+0.6%, +1.6%]

[EwoutH]

Can you split of the ruff update in a separate PR? I like to keep PRs atomic.

[rht]

Done.

[EwoutH]

Thanks! I guess it isn’t allowed in current Mesa to initialize agents with a pos right? I have seen it in other models, maybe we should write that up somewhere.

Also, which warning is this removing exactly?

[github-actions]

Performance benchmarks:

Model	Size	Init time [95% CI]	Run time [95% CI]
Schelling	small	🔵 +0.1% [-0.1%, +0.3%]	🔵 +0.5% [+0.4%, +0.7%]
Schelling	large	🔵 -0.0% [-0.4%, +0.5%]	🔵 +0.2% [-0.2%, +0.9%]
WolfSheep	small	🔵 +0.7% [-0.3%, +1.7%]	🔵 +1.2% [+1.1%, +1.4%]
WolfSheep	large	🔵 -0.0% [-0.4%, +0.4%]	🔵 +1.7% [+1.3%, +2.1%]
BoidFlockers	small	🟢 -88.0% [-88.1%, -87.9%]	🔵 -2.7% [-3.4%, -2.0%]
BoidFlockers	large	🟢 -87.9% [-88.0%, -87.9%]	🔵 -1.5% [-2.1%, -0.8%]

[rht]

Thanks! I guess it isn’t allowed in current Mesa to initialize agents with a pos right?

Allowed but not recommended.

Also, which warning is this removing exactly?

#2083