Skip to content

Conversation

@kryanbeane
Copy link
Contributor

Issue link

What changes have been made

Verification steps

Checks

  • I've made sure the tests are passing.
  • Testing Strategy
    • Unit tests
    • Manual tests
    • Testing is not required for this change

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from chipspeak and szaher October 15, 2025 16:21
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 15, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 94.24%. Comparing base (c3b831a) to head (159051f).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #929   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.24%   94.24%           
=======================================
  Files          24       24           
  Lines        2033     2033           
=======================================
  Hits         1916     1916           
  Misses        117      117           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 15, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 15, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: chipspeak

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 15, 2025
@kryanbeane
Copy link
Contributor Author

/override kubernetes
/override kuberentes-rayjob

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 15, 2025

@kryanbeane: /override requires failed status contexts, check run or a prowjob name to operate on.
The following unknown contexts/checkruns were given:

  • kuberentes-rayjob
  • kubernetes

Only the following failed contexts/checkruns were expected:

  • add-approve-lgtm-label
  • tide
  • verify-0_basic_ray
  • verify-1_cluster_job_client
  • verify-2_basic_interactive
  • verify-3_widget_example
  • verify-local_interactive
  • verify-ray_job_client

If you are trying to override a checkrun that has a space in it, you must put a double quote on the context.

In response to this:

/override kubernetes
/override kuberentes-rayjob

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit afe21b3 into project-codeflare:main Oct 15, 2025
20 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants