quarto: address inconsistencies between deprecated and live implementations

[aronatkins]

Intent

fixes #534

Type of Change

• Bug Fix
• New Feature
• Breaking Change

Approach

Port the changes from #254 into write_quarto_manifest_json()

Automated Tests

Directions for Reviewers

Checklist

• I have updated CHANGELOG.md to cover notable changes.
• I have updated all related GitHub issues to reflect their current state.

[github-actions]

☂️ Python Coverage

current status: ✅

Overall Coverage

Lines	Covered	Coverage	Threshold	Status
4421	3146	71%	0%	🟢

New Files

No new covered files...

Modified Files

File	Coverage	Status
rsconnect/actions.py	35%	🟢
rsconnect/bundle.py	80%	🟢
TOTAL	57%	🟢

updated for commit: 1d23067 by action🐍

[toph-allen]

I know naming probably isn't in scope for feedback, but this name directory was changed to file_or_directory. The name path would also work; it implies file_or_directory nicely. Feel free to disregard. (I know we already used file_or_directory before, and perhaps widely in rsconnect-python, so if this is a settled issue, definitely disregard ☺️)

[aronatkins]

This is an existing name and used as the argument name for rsconnect write-manifest quarto and rsconnect deploy quarto. We used that name to make it clearer that the target could be either a directory or a single file. This was different from the other commands at the time.

[aronatkins]

Tested manifest creation and deployment with this change:

Quarto documents (with and without Python requirements)

rsconnect write-manifest quarto index.qmd
rsconnect deploy quarto index.qmd

Quarto projects (with and without Python requirements)

rsconnect write-manifest quarto .
rsconnect deploy quarto .