Added windows CI #77
Closed
Added windows CI #77
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This should add windows CI in addition to what Travis provides.
|
Why are other branches also using AppVeyor already? Where can I find the Travis results? e.g.: see last build here: |
|
@karthik all branches now use AppVeyor and show failures. Is it possible to put this aside and use only Travis until we fix the timezone issue? |
Contributor
Author
|
I'll remove appveyor from the other branches for now. Sorry @xsaintmleux |
Contributor
Author
|
It is now set to ONLY build on the |
Collaborator
|
I'm seeing an appveyor failure in #226. Not sure what exactly is causing it, but closing this temporarily to see if it fixes it. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR will add Windows CI to the package. So in addition to what Travis accomplishes, you'll get something similar from
appveyor. You may not want to merge for now, at least until you can fix the issue that make the build fail (it does now). I'll leave it up to the Toby (or anyone else) whether or not to merge this.