Skip to content

Conversation

@jorisvandenbossche
Copy link
Member

First draft for the functional api part of #6300.

@jreback jreback added the SQL label Apr 11, 2014
@jreback jreback added this to the 0.14.0 milestone Apr 11, 2014
@jorisvandenbossche
Copy link
Member Author

OK, I think this is fine now. I only changed the toplevel api (so read_sql -> read_sql_query, read_table -> read_sql_table and a new read_sql as wrapper around both), and not yet the methods of the PandasSQLAlchemy objects (as we did not yet discuss that).

Somebody care to do a quick review? @hayd @jreback @danielballan @mangecoeur

@danielballan
Copy link
Contributor

Other than those minors docstring suggestions, looks great to me.

@hayd
Copy link
Contributor

hayd commented Apr 18, 2014

Looks good (sorry, thought I commented earlier!)

@jorisvandenbossche
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for the comments! Adapted the summary lines of the docstrings a bit.
Merging now.

jorisvandenbossche added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 18, 2014
API: update SQL functional api (GH6300)
@jorisvandenbossche jorisvandenbossche merged commit 9681959 into pandas-dev:master Apr 18, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

IO SQL to_sql, read_sql, read_sql_query

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants