Skip to content

Conversation

@Remit
Copy link
Contributor

@Remit Remit commented Feb 2, 2021

Timed pd.unique vs np.unique with 1_000 and 100_000 sequences lengths. In first case np.unique was faster, whereas in the second case pd.unique won.
Hence, I propose to make the doc a bit more accurate.

image

Timed pd.unique vs np.unique with 1_000 and 100_000 sequences lengths. In first case np.unique was faster, whereas in the second case pd.unique won.
Hence, I propose to make the doc a bit more concrete.
@jreback jreback added the Docs label Feb 3, 2021
@jreback jreback added this to the 1.3 milestone Feb 3, 2021
@jreback jreback merged commit ee8c1ff into pandas-dev:1.2.x Feb 3, 2021
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Feb 3, 2021

thanks @Remit

@simonjayhawkins
Copy link
Member

@jreback This was merged directly to 1.2.x and milestoned 1.3

revert on 1.2.x and open PR against master?

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Feb 7, 2021

oh prob an accident

simonjayhawkins pushed a commit to simonjayhawkins/pandas that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2021
jreback pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2021
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Feb 7, 2021

@Remit if you'd like to re-submit this against master.

@simonjayhawkins
Copy link
Member

#39643

jreback pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2021
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Feb 7, 2021

closed by #39643

@Remit
Copy link
Contributor Author

Remit commented Feb 7, 2021

@Remit if you'd like to re-submit this against master.

Ok, did so. Thanks!

CyberQin pushed a commit to CyberQin/pandas that referenced this pull request Feb 8, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants