Skip to content

CLN: re-use sanitize_index #38912

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 3, 2021
Merged

CLN: re-use sanitize_index #38912

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 3, 2021

Conversation

@jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member

@jbrockmendel jbrockmendel commented Jan 3, 2021

  • closes #xxxx
  • tests added / passed
  • passes black pandas
  • passes git diff upstream/master -u -- "*.py" | flake8 --diff
  • whatsnew entry

MarcoGorelli
MarcoGorelli approved these changes Jan 3, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@MarcoGorelli MarcoGorelli left a comment •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As far as I can tell this is correct

@jreback jreback added the Clean label Jan 3, 2021
@jreback jreback added this to the 1.3 milestone Jan 3, 2021
@jreback jreback added the Internals Related to non-user accessible pandas implementation label Jan 3, 2021
@jreback jreback merged commit ce943b5 into pandas-dev:master Jan 3, 2021
@jbrockmendel jbrockmendel deleted the cln-sanitize branch January 3, 2021 18:05
luckyvs1 pushed a commit to luckyvs1/pandas that referenced this pull request Jan 20, 2021
@jbrockmendel @luckyvs1
CLN: re-use sanitize_index (pandas-dev#38912)
949b9d8
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

1 more reviewer

@MarcoGorelli MarcoGorelli MarcoGorelli approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

Clean Internals Related to non-user accessible pandas implementation

Projects

None yet

Milestone

1.3

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jbrockmendel @MarcoGorelli @jreback