Skip to content

Standardize datetimelike casting behavior where/setitem/searchsorted/comparison #34055

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 7, 2020
Merged

Standardize datetimelike casting behavior where/setitem/searchsorted/comparison #34055

merged 1 commit into from
May 7, 2020

Conversation

@jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member

@jbrockmendel jbrockmendel commented May 7, 2020 •
edited
Loading

  • closes #xxxx
  • tests added / passed
  • passes black pandas
  • passes git diff upstream/master -u -- "*.py" | flake8 --diff
  • whatsnew entry

Addresses #30699 for eq/ne, but not for inequalities.

@jreback jreback added the Datetime Datetime data dtype label May 7, 2020
@jreback jreback added this to the 1.1 milestone May 7, 2020
@jreback jreback merged commit 3ed7dff into pandas-dev:master May 7, 2020
@jbrockmendel jbrockmendel deleted the dtlike-validators-listlike-2 branch May 8, 2020 17:16
rhshadrach pushed a commit to rhshadrach/pandas that referenced this pull request May 10, 2020
@jbrockmendel @rhshadrach
BUG: datetimelike/categorical comparisons, standardize behavior (pand…
6f8b94f 
…as-dev#34055)
@jbrockmendel jbrockmendel mentioned this pull request May 11, 2020
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jreback jreback jreback approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

Datetime Datetime data dtype

Projects

None yet

Milestone

1.1

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@jbrockmendel @jreback