Skip to content

Conversation

@kordek
Copy link
Contributor

@kordek kordek commented Apr 30, 2016

closes GH10001

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Apr 30, 2016

pls add some tests

@jreback jreback added the IO Excel read_excel, to_excel label Apr 30, 2016
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

rather than a giant try: except: can you narrow down its placement

@kordek kordek force-pushed the #10001 branch 2 times, most recently from d4ebfdb to 515a5fb Compare April 30, 2016 18:07
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Apr 30, 2016

Current coverage is 84.14%

Merging #13042 into master will decrease coverage by -<.01%

@@             master     #13042   diff @@
==========================================
  Files           137        137          
  Lines         50214      50220     +6   
  Methods           0          0          
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches          0          0          
==========================================
+ Hits          42253      42256     +3   
- Misses         7961       7964     +3   
  Partials          0          0          

Powered by Codecov. Last updated by b42d1dc...5724ea0

@kordek kordek force-pushed the #10001 branch 3 times, most recently from 77951ed to c3523db Compare May 1, 2016 10:40
@kordek
Copy link
Contributor Author

kordek commented May 1, 2016

Prevoiusly failed tests on the lines that now appear as uncovered according to codecov, I'm not getting this.

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented May 1, 2016

if you want to rebase I think I fixed codecov

@kordek
Copy link
Contributor Author

kordek commented May 1, 2016

Thanks, seems ok now

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented May 1, 2016

can u post a screen shot of what this excel file looks like

@kordek
Copy link
Contributor Author

kordek commented May 1, 2016

image

Hashed cell is this 10^n number

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

construct the expected frame and use assert_frame_equal

@kordek
Copy link
Contributor Author

kordek commented May 1, 2016

Same thing with codecov

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented May 1, 2016

you need to rebase on master

git rebase -i orgin/master

you are not picking up the change I made recently.

@kordek kordek force-pushed the #10001 branch 2 times, most recently from 2441fcb to 05683f6 Compare May 1, 2016 20:40
@kordek
Copy link
Contributor Author

kordek commented May 1, 2016

check now pls

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am think this would be converted as an integer, right? (or is it actually a float)

Copy link
Contributor Author

@kordek kordek May 2, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the current implementation it is a float (simply cell_contents is returned). Or such way would be more desired ?:

val = int(cell_contents)
                if val == cell_contents:
                    cell_contents = val

closes GH10001

If there is a date column in excel in which there are cells with some big
integers, that during parsing to date cause int/long overflow, issue a
warning and convert the value to int or float.
@jreback jreback added this to the 0.18.2 milestone May 6, 2016
@jreback jreback closed this in 1296ab3 May 6, 2016
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented May 6, 2016

thanks @kordek

@kordek kordek deleted the #10001 branch June 21, 2016 19:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

IO Excel read_excel, to_excel

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

pandas.ExcelFile ignore parse_dates=False

3 participants