-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 55
add reconfigurator-cli command for bumping Nexus generation #9033
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…nfigurator-cli-bump-generation
…nfigurator-cli-bump-generation
…i-bump-generation
internal_dns 427ec88f-f467-42fa-9bbb-66a91a36103c install dataset in service fd00:1122:3344:2::1 | ||
internal_ntp 6444f8a5-6465-4f0b-a549-1993c113569c install dataset in service fd00:1122:3344:101::21 | ||
nexus 0c71b3b2-6ceb-4e8f-b020-b08675e83038 install dataset in service fd00:1122:3344:101::22 | ||
+ nexus 16a766ee-9400-4e67-9363-883670371a1b install dataset in service fd00:1122:3344:101::28 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(Not in this PR) Should we have a column for the Nexus generation in this zones table? Sucks that it only applies to Nexus, but it seems like a pretty vital piece of info.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you want I could have it be a follow-up to #9034
IMO it's pretty handy to see the nexus_generation
info co-located with the db_metdata_nexus
info, because they're so tightly correlated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I do think we should do this. I was thinking we might want to add a table to the blueprint show
output for this, similar to DNS I think? Rather than this table.
I'm game to include it in the database state as well but I think it's important to be able to see it from just the blueprint state too (e.g., in reconfigurator-cli
).
This will be useful for being able to test Nexus handoffs manually. (I was doing this by hand before.)
Depends on #9023.