Skip to content

Conversation

@iximeow
Copy link
Member

@iximeow iximeow commented Jun 3, 2025

for the service-specific builder methods, the service name was expected as an argument but its only value was to check it was the same name that builder expected. the Clickhouse-related methods then used other associated names when they would set up multiple records!

the only value of the service_name argument seems to be as defensive programming, but it seems to primarily be a kind of redundant toestubber - if there were a copypaste error this would have caught, we still would likely still catch it. without the service name checks in service-specific helpers, we'd see one service defined as multiple zones on the same sled. this would also error!

(one of the two followups i'd talked with @davepacheco about in #8047)

for the service-specific builder methods, the service name was expected
as an argument but its only value was to check it was the same name that
builder expected. the Clickhouse-related methods then used other names
when they would set up multiple records!

the only value of the `service_name` argument seems to be as defensive
programming, but it seems to primarily be a kind of redundant footgun -
if there were a copypaste error this would have caught, we still would
define a service as multiple zones on the same sled. this would also
error! we would still detect erroneous configurations.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants