Skip to content

Conversation

metacosm
Copy link
Collaborator

The class resolving mechanism is only needed in that class right now

Signed-off-by: Chris Laprun [email protected]

The class resolving mechanism is only needed in that class right now

Signed-off-by: Chris Laprun <[email protected]>
@metacosm metacosm self-assigned this Jun 20, 2024
@metacosm metacosm requested a review from csviri June 20, 2024 09:02
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from adam-sandor June 20, 2024 09:02
Copy link
Collaborator

@csviri csviri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, simpler is better :)

@metacosm metacosm merged commit 976a091 into next Jun 20, 2024
@metacosm metacosm deleted the remove-class-resolver branch June 20, 2024 13:31
metacosm added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2024
…2451)

The class resolving mechanism is only needed in that class right now

Signed-off-by: Chris Laprun <[email protected]>
metacosm added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2024
…2451)

The class resolving mechanism is only needed in that class right now

Signed-off-by: Chris Laprun <[email protected]>
metacosm added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2024
…2451)

The class resolving mechanism is only needed in that class right now

Signed-off-by: Chris Laprun <[email protected]>
csviri pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2024
…2451)

The class resolving mechanism is only needed in that class right now

Signed-off-by: Chris Laprun <[email protected]>
csviri pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2024
…2451)

The class resolving mechanism is only needed in that class right now

Signed-off-by: Chris Laprun <[email protected]>
metacosm added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2024
…2451)

The class resolving mechanism is only needed in that class right now

Signed-off-by: Chris Laprun <[email protected]>
csviri pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2024
…2451)

The class resolving mechanism is only needed in that class right now

Signed-off-by: Chris Laprun <[email protected]>
metacosm added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2024
…2451)

The class resolving mechanism is only needed in that class right now

Signed-off-by: Chris Laprun <[email protected]>
metacosm added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
…2451)

The class resolving mechanism is only needed in that class right now

Signed-off-by: Chris Laprun <[email protected]>
metacosm added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2024
…2451)

The class resolving mechanism is only needed in that class right now

Signed-off-by: Chris Laprun <[email protected]>
csviri pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2024
…2451)

The class resolving mechanism is only needed in that class right now

Signed-off-by: Chris Laprun <[email protected]>
metacosm added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2024
…2451)

The class resolving mechanism is only needed in that class right now

Signed-off-by: Chris Laprun <[email protected]>
metacosm added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2024
…2451)

The class resolving mechanism is only needed in that class right now

Signed-off-by: Chris Laprun <[email protected]>
metacosm added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2024
…2451)

The class resolving mechanism is only needed in that class right now

Signed-off-by: Chris Laprun <[email protected]>
csviri pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2024
…2451)

The class resolving mechanism is only needed in that class right now

Signed-off-by: Chris Laprun <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants