Skip to content

Conversation

@pablintino
Copy link
Contributor

In CI we have observed that we really need the kubernetes testing framework cloud providers.
As nothing is pointing to them they are not vendored in, so by adding a blank import now all are imported.

- What I did

Vendor in the kubernetes framework Cloud providers.

- How to verify it

Run our OTE binary using the TEST_PROVIDER environment variable pointing to a non-default cloud provider, like this:

TEST_PROVIDER=aws ./machine-config-tests-ext run-suite openshift/machine-config-operator/disruptive

- Description for the changelog
A blank import was added to vendor the necessary but unreferenced Kubernetes testing framework cloud providers for CI.

In CI we have observed that we really need the kubernetes testing
framework cloud providers.
As nothing is pointing to them they are not vendored in, so by adding a
blank import now all are imported.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jun 27, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 27, 2025

@pablintino: This pull request references MCO-1741 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

In CI we have observed that we really need the kubernetes testing framework cloud providers.
As nothing is pointing to them they are not vendored in, so by adding a blank import now all are imported.

- What I did

Vendor in the kubernetes framework Cloud providers.

- How to verify it

Run our OTE binary using the TEST_PROVIDER environment variable pointing to a non-default cloud provider, like this:

TEST_PROVIDER=aws ./machine-config-tests-ext run-suite openshift/machine-config-operator/disruptive

- Description for the changelog
A blank import was added to vendor the necessary but unreferenced Kubernetes testing framework cloud providers for CI.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 27, 2025
@pablintino
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test unit

@pablintino
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Copy link
Contributor

@yuqi-zhang yuqi-zhang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

logically lgtm, happy to let this merge and try to validate via the origin PR

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 27, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 27, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: pablintino, yuqi-zhang

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [pablintino,yuqi-zhang]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 36a1298 and 2 for PR HEAD 0cda7f1 in total

@yuqi-zhang
Copy link
Contributor

this can't affect gcp so

/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-op

Until GCP gets fixed

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 27, 2025

@yuqi-zhang: Overrode contexts on behalf of yuqi-zhang: ci/prow/e2e-gcp-op

In response to this:

this can't affect gcp so

/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-op

Until GCP gets fixed

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@pablintino
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-aws-ovn

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD a08d5ec and 1 for PR HEAD 0cda7f1 in total

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 28, 2025

@pablintino: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-op-techpreview 0cda7f1 link false /test e2e-gcp-op-techpreview
ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade-out-of-change 0cda7f1 link false /test e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade-out-of-change
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-op-ocl 0cda7f1 link false /test e2e-gcp-op-ocl

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit febcfba into openshift:main Jun 28, 2025
17 of 20 checks passed
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: ose-machine-config-operator
This PR has been included in build ose-machine-config-operator-container-v4.20.0-202506280911.p0.gfebcfba.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants