Skip to content

Conversation

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #1397

/assign mrniranjan

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62153 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62721. Will retitle bug to link to clone.
/retitle [release-4.20] OCPBUGS-62721: E2E: skip SMT disabled test when L3 cache spans entire NUMA node

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #1397

/assign mrniranjan

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.20] OCPBUGS-62153: E2E: skip SMT disabled test when L3 cache spans entire NUMA node [release-4.20] OCPBUGS-62721: E2E: skip SMT disabled test when L3 cache spans entire NUMA node Oct 6, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from MarSik and swatisehgal October 6, 2025 08:39
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 6, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-cherrypick-robot
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign jmencak for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 6, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62721, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.20.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.20.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62153 is in the state MODIFIED, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62153 targets the "4.21.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.21.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @mrniranjan

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #1397

/assign mrniranjan

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from mrniranjan October 6, 2025 08:39
@mrniranjan
Copy link
Contributor

/close

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot closed this Oct 7, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62721. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. All external bug links have been closed. The bug has been moved to the NEW state.

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #1397

/assign mrniranjan

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 7, 2025

@mrniranjan: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@mrniranjan
Copy link
Contributor

/open

@mrniranjan
Copy link
Contributor

/reopen

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot reopened this Oct 17, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 17, 2025

@mrniranjan: Reopened this PR.

In response to this:

/reopen

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Oct 17, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62721, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62153 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but it is POST instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #1397

/assign mrniranjan

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Oct 17, 2025
@mrniranjan
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

@mrniranjan
Copy link
Contributor

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Oct 17, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@mrniranjan: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62721, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.20.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.20.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62153 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62153 targets the "4.21.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.21.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @mrniranjan

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Oct 17, 2025
@mrniranjan
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 28, 2025

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants