Skip to content

Conversation

@Tal-or
Copy link
Contributor

@Tal-or Tal-or commented Sep 28, 2025

We want to use rhel9 as the image for the test pod which does not have libhugetlbfs.so.
Instead we're using a small in-house tool allocate the hugepages
and test functionality.

We want to use rhel9 as the image for the test pod which does not have libhugetlbfs.so.
Instead we're using a small in-house tool allocate the hugepages
and test functionality.

Signed-off-by: Talor Itzhak <[email protected]>
4.19 is using rhel9

Signed-off-by: Talor Itzhak <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Sep 28, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@Tal-or: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue.

In response to this:

We want to use rhel9 as the image for the test pod which does not have libhugetlbfs.so.
Instead we're using a small in-house tool allocate the hugepages
and test functionality.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from ffromani and yanirq September 28, 2025 12:03
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 28, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Tal-or
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign yanirq for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@Tal-or
Copy link
Contributor Author

Tal-or commented Sep 29, 2025

/retest

2 similar comments
@Tal-or
Copy link
Contributor Author

Tal-or commented Oct 15, 2025

/retest

@oblau
Copy link

oblau commented Oct 16, 2025

/retest

@oblau
Copy link

oblau commented Oct 16, 2025

/retitle ocpbugs-63190: e2e:hugepages: changing tests to use hugepages-allocator tool

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title NO-JIRA:e2e:hugepages: changing tests to use hugepages-allocator tool ocpbugs-63190: e2e:hugepages: changing tests to use hugepages-allocator tool Oct 16, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@Tal-or: This pull request references ocpbugs-63190 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

We want to use rhel9 as the image for the test pod which does not have libhugetlbfs.so.
Instead we're using a small in-house tool allocate the hugepages
and test functionality.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@oblau
Copy link

oblau commented Oct 16, 2025

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 16, 2025
@oblau
Copy link

oblau commented Oct 16, 2025

/retitle OCPBUGS-63190: e2e:hugepages: changing tests to use hugepages-allocator tool

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title ocpbugs-63190: e2e:hugepages: changing tests to use hugepages-allocator tool OCPBUGS-63190: e2e:hugepages: changing tests to use hugepages-allocator tool Oct 16, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Oct 16, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@Tal-or: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63190, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @mrniranjan

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

We want to use rhel9 as the image for the test pod which does not have libhugetlbfs.so.
Instead we're using a small in-house tool allocate the hugepages
and test functionality.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from mrniranjan October 16, 2025 07:48
@Tal-or
Copy link
Contributor Author

Tal-or commented Oct 19, 2025

/retest

1 similar comment
@Tal-or
Copy link
Contributor Author

Tal-or commented Oct 23, 2025

/retest

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 23, 2025

@Tal-or: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-pao-updating-profile d606be7 link true /test e2e-gcp-pao-updating-profile

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants