Skip to content

8277324: C2 compilation fails with "bad AD file" on x86-32 after JDK-8276162 due to missing match rule #6427

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

TobiHartmann
Copy link
Member

@TobiHartmann TobiHartmann commented Nov 17, 2021

JDK-8276162 introduced an optimization that creates CMoveI (Bool (CmpUL ...) ...) shapes but x86-32 misses the corresponding match rules in C2's backend.

I also fixed two comments incorrectly referring to ints instead of ptrs.

Thanks,
Tobias


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8277324: C2 compilation fails with "bad AD file" on x86-32 after JDK-8276162 due to missing match rule

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/6427/head:pull/6427
$ git checkout pull/6427

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/6427
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/6427/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 6427

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 6427

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6427.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 17, 2021

👋 Welcome back thartmann! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Nov 17, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 17, 2021

@TobiHartmann The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 17, 2021

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@chhagedorn chhagedorn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Otherwise, the fix looks good!

Comment on lines 13157 to 13160
format %{ "CMOV$cmp $dst,$src" %}
opcode(0x0F,0x40);
ins_encode( enc_cmov(cmp), RegReg( dst, src ) );
ins_pipe( pipe_cmov_reg );
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since this code is shared with cmovII_reg_LTGE, we could directly use it with expand:

  expand %{
    cmovII_reg_LTGE(cmp, flags, dst, src);
  %}

Could also be done for the other cases.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Christian, that's a good suggestion. I thought expand does not work because the argument types differ but it does. I updated the patch.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! AFAICT the two operands flagsReg_(u)long_LTGE only differ in their format string which is probably why it works. But maybe someone else can jump in here who knows the code better.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 17, 2021

@TobiHartmann This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8277324: C2 compilation fails with "bad AD file" on x86-32 after JDK-8276162 due to missing match rule

Reviewed-by: chagedorn, roland

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 43 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 2f20b0d: 8273039: JShell crashes when naming variable or method "abstract" or "strictfp"
  • f34f119: 8277213: CompileTask_lock is acquired out of order with MethodCompileQueue_lock
  • 47564ca: 8275643: C2's unaryOp vector intrinsic does not properly handle LongVector.neg
  • 2f0bde1: 8277102: Dubious PrintCompilation output
  • 839033b: 8276976: Rename LIR_OprDesc to LIR_Opr
  • 89b125f: 8275527: Refactor forward pointer access
  • 36bd4a3: 8277404: Test VMDeprecatedOptions.java failing with Unable to create shared archive file
  • 57eb864: 8276927: [PPC64] Port shenandoahgc to linux on ppc64le
  • 8db0c36: 8277414: ProblemList runtime/CommandLine/VMDeprecatedOptions.java on windows-x64
  • 03473b4: 8270874: JFrame paint artifacts when dragged from standard monitor to HiDPI monitor
  • ... and 33 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/08f65a59a7bd387974d94253ec7093524a3e92f1...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 17, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@rwestrel rwestrel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@TobiHartmann
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for the reviews, Christian and Roland!

@TobiHartmann
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 19, 2021

Going to push as commit 3a76d39.
Since your change was applied there have been 43 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 2f20b0d: 8273039: JShell crashes when naming variable or method "abstract" or "strictfp"
  • f34f119: 8277213: CompileTask_lock is acquired out of order with MethodCompileQueue_lock
  • 47564ca: 8275643: C2's unaryOp vector intrinsic does not properly handle LongVector.neg
  • 2f0bde1: 8277102: Dubious PrintCompilation output
  • 839033b: 8276976: Rename LIR_OprDesc to LIR_Opr
  • 89b125f: 8275527: Refactor forward pointer access
  • 36bd4a3: 8277404: Test VMDeprecatedOptions.java failing with Unable to create shared archive file
  • 57eb864: 8276927: [PPC64] Port shenandoahgc to linux on ppc64le
  • 8db0c36: 8277414: ProblemList runtime/CommandLine/VMDeprecatedOptions.java on windows-x64
  • 03473b4: 8270874: JFrame paint artifacts when dragged from standard monitor to HiDPI monitor
  • ... and 33 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/08f65a59a7bd387974d94253ec7093524a3e92f1...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 19, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Nov 19, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 19, 2021

@TobiHartmann Pushed as commit 3a76d39.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-compiler [email protected] integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants