-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8277324: C2 compilation fails with "bad AD file" on x86-32 after JDK-8276162 due to missing match rule #6427
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…8276162 due to missing match rule
👋 Welcome back thartmann! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@TobiHartmann The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Otherwise, the fix looks good!
src/hotspot/cpu/x86/x86_32.ad
Outdated
format %{ "CMOV$cmp $dst,$src" %} | ||
opcode(0x0F,0x40); | ||
ins_encode( enc_cmov(cmp), RegReg( dst, src ) ); | ||
ins_pipe( pipe_cmov_reg ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since this code is shared with cmovII_reg_LTGE
, we could directly use it with expand
:
expand %{
cmovII_reg_LTGE(cmp, flags, dst, src);
%}
Could also be done for the other cases.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks Christian, that's a good suggestion. I thought expand does not work because the argument types differ but it does. I updated the patch.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good! AFAICT the two operands flagsReg_(u)long_LTGE
only differ in their format string which is probably why it works. But maybe someone else can jump in here who knows the code better.
@TobiHartmann This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 43 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me.
Thanks for the reviews, Christian and Roland! |
/integrate |
Going to push as commit 3a76d39.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@TobiHartmann Pushed as commit 3a76d39. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
JDK-8276162 introduced an optimization that creates
CMoveI (Bool (CmpUL ...) ...)
shapes but x86-32 misses the corresponding match rules in C2's backend.I also fixed two comments incorrectly referring to ints instead of ptrs.
Thanks,
Tobias
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/6427/head:pull/6427
$ git checkout pull/6427
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/6427
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/6427/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 6427
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 6427
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6427.diff