-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8349183: [BACKOUT] Optimization for StringBuilder append boolean & null #23425
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back jpai! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@jaikiran This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
|
This backport pull request has now been updated with issues from the original commit. |
|
@jaikiran The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
|
@jaikiran You need to get approval for JDK 24 backport. |
Agreed. A approval request has already been raised https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8349183?focusedId=14746841&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-14746841. |
RogerRiggs
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, thanks. A second reviewer might be useful.
|
Thank you Roger and Chen for the reviews. Approval for backporting the 2 issues, linked to this PR, into jdk24 has now been granted. I've run tier1 through tier6 with these changes in our CI and that has completed without related issues. tier7 and tier8 are progressing fine too. I'll go ahead and integrate this shortly. |
|
/integrate |
Can I please get a review of this backport of #23420 into jdk24?
This proposes to bring in those same backouts into
jdk24to prevent the issue noted in that PR description. jdk24 is in rampdown and this backport will require an approval. A approval request has been raised in https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8349183?focusedId=14746841&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-14746841.This backport into jdk24 wasn't clean due to a trivial merge conflict in
StringLatin1.javafile. That merge conflict was manually resolved (just like it was done against mainline). The git commands used to create this backport against jdk24 branch are:tier1, tier2 and tier3 testing is currently in progress with this change.
Progress
Issues
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23425/head:pull/23425$ git checkout pull/23425Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/23425$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23425/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 23425View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 23425Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23425.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment