8344534: Remove leftover import of java.security.AccessControlContext in JavaLangAccess

[eirbjo]

Please review this trivial cleanup of an unused import of AccessControlContext in JavaLangAccess.

This was left over after #22035 removed JavaLangAccess::newThreadWithAcc(Runnable, AccessControlContext).

Verification: make images succeeds.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8344534: Remove leftover import of java.security.AccessControlContext in JavaLangAccess (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

• Alan Bateman (@AlanBateman - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22234/head:pull/22234
$ git checkout pull/22234

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/22234
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22234/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 22234

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 22234

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22234.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[eirbjo]

Channeling @AlanBateman to have a look.

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back eirbjo! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@eirbjo This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8344534: Remove leftover import of java.security.AccessControlContext in JavaLangAccess

Reviewed-by: alanb

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 5 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 0d66689: 8344393: RISC-V: Remove option UseRVVForBigIntegerShiftIntrinsics
• 7540fa2: 8343884: [s390x] Disallow OptoScheduling
• 9d60300: 8344199: Incorrect excluded field value set by getEventWriter intrinsic
• 8bd080b: 8341901: Using 'var' keyword switch pattern matching causes compiler error
• 76a55c3: 8341334: CDS: Parallel relocation

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[openjdk]

@eirbjo The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• core-libs
• security

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (d91deb39)

[AlanBateman]

Okay but hardly worth doing as JLA is changed very frequently so any unused imports will be quickly removed.

[eirbjo]

Okay but hardly worth doing as JLA is changed very frequently so any unused imports will be quickly removed.

Thanks Alan. I'll go ahead and integrate this now, but I'm taking note of your point for any future changes in similar contexts.

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 2359736.
Since your change was applied there have been 5 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 0d66689: 8344393: RISC-V: Remove option UseRVVForBigIntegerShiftIntrinsics
• 7540fa2: 8343884: [s390x] Disallow OptoScheduling
• 9d60300: 8344199: Incorrect excluded field value set by getEventWriter intrinsic
• 8bd080b: 8341901: Using 'var' keyword switch pattern matching causes compiler error
• 76a55c3: 8341334: CDS: Parallel relocation

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@eirbjo Pushed as commit 2359736.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.