-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8341784: Refactor TypeVect to use a BasicType instead of a const Type* #21414
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back qamai! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@merykitty This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 70 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
|
@merykitty The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
vnkozlov
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks reasonable. Need to test it internally.
src/hotspot/share/opto/type.cpp
Outdated
| //------------------------------meet------------------------------------------- | ||
| // Compute the MEET of two types. It returns a new Type object. | ||
| const Type *TypeVect::xmeet( const Type *t ) const { | ||
| // Compute the MEET of two types. It returns a new Type object. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It never returns new type now.
|
My testing passed. |
|
@vnkozlov Thanks for your reviews and testings, the latest commit addresses your concern, as well as contains some minor style changes and a removal of switch case duplication. |
vnkozlov
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good.
You need second review because change is not trivial.
jaskarth
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is a really nice cleanup, it makes working with vectors more clear. I've added some minor stylistic fixes you could do since you're already changing these lines.
|
@jaskarth Nice suggestions, I have reviewed the patch and done similar changes to nearby lines. |
jaskarth
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, looks good to me!
|
@vnkozlov Could you re-review this, please, it seems required. |
vnkozlov
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Update is good.
|
Thanks a lot for your reviews |
|
Going to push as commit 7276a1b.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
|
@merykitty Pushed as commit 7276a1b. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
|
Hi @merykitty , LGTM. Best Regards. |
|
@jatin-bhateja Thanks a lot for your reviews. |
|
@merykitty I was out on vacation and missed this patch. Can you tell me why the |
|
Ah, I guess that is generally the letter we use when passing longs, like in method signatures. And that is because |
Welcome to the in-between world of Java and the JVM :-) |
Hi,
This patch refactors
TypeVectto use aBasicTypeinstead of aconst Type*as our current implementation. This conveys the element information in a clearer and safer manner.Please take a look and leave your reviews,
Thanks a lot.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21414/head:pull/21414$ git checkout pull/21414Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/21414$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21414/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 21414View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 21414Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21414.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment