Compiler error for VC10 removed #556
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
modified: modules/line_descriptor/perf/perf_matching.cpp modified: modules/line_descriptor/test/test_matcher_regression.cpp
Member
|
Any ideas why "(2 << i)" can't be used here? |
modified: modules/line_descriptor/perf/perf_matching.cpp modified: modules/line_descriptor/test/test_matcher_regression.cpp
Contributor
Author
|
@alalek |
Member
|
👍 |
opencv-pushbot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 20, 2016
allnes
pushed a commit
to allnes/opencv_contrib
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 9, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If have observed two compiler errors when compiling with MS Visual Studio 2010. The
reason is the function pow( 2, i ) . The first argument should not be an integer but rather
a float or double number. For this reason, I have replaced this function by pow( 2.0, i ) ,
I have done this in two cases. The changes should not have any effect on the calculation.