Skip to content

Conversation

AurelienJaquier
Copy link
Contributor

I made changes in a similar way to PR #171

CalibrationResult schema is still in discussion with scientific team, so this is subject to change.

@AurelienJaquier AurelienJaquier self-assigned this May 21, 2025
@jdcourcol
Copy link
Contributor

@AurelienJaquier I did not notice you created one.

I made one here

The difference is that I want to enforce that specific properties are present. Otherwise it is a bit "free form"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants