Skip to content

Conversation

@zcstarr
Copy link
Member

@zcstarr zcstarr commented Sep 25, 2025

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 25, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.75%. Comparing base (6639ee3) to head (1096a86).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #350      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   99.27%   99.75%   +0.47%     
==========================================
  Files          11       11              
  Lines         416      404      -12     
  Branches       64       56       -8     
==========================================
- Hits          413      403      -10     
+ Misses          3        1       -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

…ing to

clientjs.

We introduce ESM to make clientjs work better with modern ts/js build
systems. This is a breaking change and the old commonjs version will
remain on the feature branch version 1.x.x of the build.

BREAKING CHANGE: CommonJS and ES5 no longer supported
working_directory: ~/client-js
docker:
- image: cimg/node:20.11.0
- image: cimg/node:24.10.0
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is there a bun one?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think there is an official one, regardless I think it's maybe better to stay on node runtime maybe for a cpl iterations, as bun runtime is so new and most users are probably going to be using node.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants