Skip to content

Conversation

mbostock
Copy link
Member

@mbostock mbostock commented Jan 16, 2023

This seems to work. Example of prettier failure: https://github.com/observablehq/plot/actions/runs/3933377163

@mbostock mbostock force-pushed the mbostock/unify-workflow branch from e8770f0 to a5f597c Compare January 16, 2023 19:24
@mbostock mbostock requested a review from Fil January 16, 2023 19:27
@mbostock mbostock marked this pull request as ready for review January 16, 2023 19:27
- run: |
echo ::add-matcher::.github/eslint.json
yarn run eslint . --format=compact
yarn run eslint src test --format=compact
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the eslint . works in CI because we haven’t generated any files yet (whereas it will fail locally with errors on generated files in build and types). So, this is just being more explicit about what we’re testing so that it’s not confusing when you try to run this command locally.

@mbostock mbostock merged commit eec122d into main Jan 16, 2023
@mbostock mbostock deleted the mbostock/unify-workflow branch January 16, 2023 21:33
chaichontat pushed a commit to chaichontat/plot that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants