Skip to content

Conversation

codebytere
Copy link
Member

@codebytere codebytere commented May 1, 2025

OPENSSL_TLS_SECURITY_LEVEL isn't defined at all in BoringSSL and will cause compilation failures.

Ref #57323
Ref #56601

See boringssl search results

@codebytere codebytere requested a review from jasnell May 1, 2025 17:51
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/crypto
  • @nodejs/security-wg

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. labels May 1, 2025
@codebytere codebytere requested a review from mhdawson May 1, 2025 17:52
Copy link
Member

@mhdawson mhdawson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@codebytere codebytere added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label May 2, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label May 2, 2025
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@tniessen
Copy link
Member

tniessen commented May 2, 2025

FWIW, the default value is only 1 for OpenSSL < 3.2. On systems that compile and link against OpenSSL >= 3.2, the default value is already 2. That being said, I assume BoringSSL is still targeting OpenSSL 1.0.2/1.1.0/1.1.1 instead of 3.x, so assuming the pre-3.2 default seems reasonable.

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@richardlau richardlau added the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label May 12, 2025
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label May 12, 2025
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot merged commit f56590e into nodejs:main May 12, 2025
66 checks passed
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Landed in f56590e

targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 16, 2025
PR-URL: #58103
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <[email protected]>
@aduh95 aduh95 added the backport-requested-v22.x PRs awaiting manual backport to the v22.x-staging branch. label Jun 10, 2025
@aduh95
Copy link
Contributor

aduh95 commented Jun 10, 2025

This does not land cleanly on v22.x-staging

npaun pushed a commit to npaun/ncrypto that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2025
PR-URL: nodejs/node#58103
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <[email protected]>
npaun pushed a commit to npaun/ncrypto that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2025
PR-URL: nodejs/node#58103
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport-requested-v22.x PRs awaiting manual backport to the v22.x-staging branch. dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants