Skip to content

test: improve util-format code coverage #41572

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 19, 2022
Merged

test: improve util-format code coverage #41572

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
7 changes: 7 additions & 0 deletions test/parallel/test-util-format.js
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -143,6 +143,13 @@ assert.strictEqual(
'1180591620717411303424n 12345678901234567890123n'
);

assert.strictEqual(
util.formatWithOptions(
{ numericSeparator: true },
'%i %d', 1180591620717411303424n, 12345678901234567890123n),
'1_180_591_620_717_411_303_424n 12_345_678_901_234_567_890_123n'
);

// Float format specifier
assert.strictEqual(util.format('%f'), '%f');
assert.strictEqual(util.format('%f', 42.0), '42');
Expand Down