Skip to content

Conversation

Zirak
Copy link
Contributor

@Zirak Zirak commented Nov 15, 2015

When writing multiline input, one can't chain function calls as if the
lines begin with a period, since those are treated as REPL commands.

Before:

> ([0, 1, 2]
... .map(x => x + 1))
Invalid REPL keyword

After:

> ([0, 1, 2]
... .map(x => x + 1))
[ 1, 2, 3 ]

When writing multiline input, one can't chain function calls as if the
lines begin with a period, since those are treated as REPL commands.

Before:

    > ([0, 1, 2]
    ... .map(x => x + 1))
    Invalid REPL keyword

After:

    > ([0, 1, 2]
    ... .map(x => x + 1))
    [ 1, 2, 3 ]
@thefourtheye thefourtheye added the repl Issues and PRs related to the REPL subsystem. label Nov 15, 2015
@thefourtheye
Copy link
Contributor

Actually, this is intentional. Let's say user types in something invalid, they can always type .break.

@Zirak
Copy link
Contributor Author

Zirak commented Nov 15, 2015

Oh yes, this preserves the current behaviour, just additionally allowing for chaining. So the following still works:

> ([0, 1, 2]
... .break
> 

@thefourtheye
Copy link
Contributor

Oh, that's right. REPL command check happens before this. LGTM then.

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Nov 16, 2015

LGTM

@jasnell jasnell added the semver-minor PRs that contain new features and should be released in the next minor version. label Nov 16, 2015
@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Nov 16, 2015

marked semver-minor since this represents a new capability in the REPL as opposed to a fix.

@thefourtheye
Copy link
Contributor

@jasnell We can argue that its a bug fix, as ([0, 1, 2]\n .map(x => x + 1)) will throw Invalid REPL command right now. But, as 5.1.0 is around the corner, semver-minor is okay I guess.

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Nov 16, 2015

It's a... ahem.. minor... point ;-) It'll land in v5.x soon either way. It's just not likely to be something that would land in v4.x.

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Nov 18, 2015

@nodejs/collaborators ... some additional review on this one would be appreciated. thank you!

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/846/

Our repl tests are pretty good, Rubber-Stamp LGTM if it works.

@trevnorris
Copy link
Contributor

failing tests look unrelated. gtg.

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

@Zirak your git info is Author: Zirak <[email protected]> Are you ok with that? I can't tell if that's just a username or not. Usually we use full names, but you are not required to if you'd rather be known as something else. :)

@Zirak
Copy link
Contributor Author

Zirak commented Dec 1, 2015

@Fishrock123 On this part of the internet I go as Zirak.

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

Ok, sounds good. Merging. :)

Fishrock123 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2015
When writing multiline input, one can't chain function calls as if the
lines begin with a period, since those are treated as REPL commands.

Before:

    > ([0, 1, 2]
    ... .map(x => x + 1))
    Invalid REPL keyword

After:

    > ([0, 1, 2]
    ... .map(x => x + 1))
    [ 1, 2, 3 ]

PR-URL: #3835
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <[email protected]>
@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks, landed in 451254e!

@Fishrock123 Fishrock123 closed this Dec 2, 2015
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2015
When writing multiline input, one can't chain function calls as if the
lines begin with a period, since those are treated as REPL commands.

Before:

    > ([0, 1, 2]
    ... .map(x => x + 1))
    Invalid REPL keyword

After:

    > ([0, 1, 2]
    ... .map(x => x + 1))
    [ 1, 2, 3 ]

PR-URL: #3835
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <[email protected]>
scovetta pushed a commit to scovetta/node that referenced this pull request Apr 2, 2016
When writing multiline input, one can't chain function calls as if the
lines begin with a period, since those are treated as REPL commands.

Before:

    > ([0, 1, 2]
    ... .map(x => x + 1))
    Invalid REPL keyword

After:

    > ([0, 1, 2]
    ... .map(x => x + 1))
    [ 1, 2, 3 ]

PR-URL: nodejs#3835
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
repl Issues and PRs related to the REPL subsystem. semver-minor PRs that contain new features and should be released in the next minor version.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants