Skip to content

Conversation

@mitsos1os
Copy link
Contributor

@mitsos1os mitsos1os commented Jan 15, 2021

Backport to v14 of #36633
It has been merged to latest v15 but for the time being not in the v14.x branch.

Some changes needed because code in _http_outgoing.js and tests is different between versions v14 and v15

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added http Issues or PRs related to the http subsystem. v14.x labels Jan 15, 2021
@mitsos1os mitsos1os mentioned this pull request Jan 15, 2021
4 tasks
@mitsos1os
Copy link
Contributor Author

I can't directly request a review on the PR, so according to the original PR reviewers, @mcollina @benjamingr @danielleadams @rickyes could you please take a look?

Thanks!

@mcollina
Copy link
Member

This needs a CITGM run before landing.

@mitsos1os
Copy link
Contributor Author

This needs a CITGM run before landing.

Ok thanks! Do I need to do anything else, or will the required labels be automatically added for CI testing?

@richardlau richardlau added the needs-citgm PRs that need a CITGM CI run. label Jan 16, 2021
@mcollina
Copy link
Member

https://ci.nodejs.org/view/Node.js-citgm/job/citgm-smoker/2570/ might do the trick

mcollina
mcollina previously approved these changes Jan 18, 2021
Copy link
Member

@mcollina mcollina left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm.

@mcollina
Copy link
Member

v14.x-staging CITGM because there are a few suspects: https://ci.nodejs.org/view/Node.js-citgm/job/citgm-smoker/2572/

@mcollina mcollina dismissed their stale review January 18, 2021 18:07

too quick

@mitsos1os
Copy link
Contributor Author

mitsos1os commented Jan 19, 2021

@mcollina sorry but didn't get what "too quick" was referring to... 😄
Is CITGM OK or are there any problems?

Copy link
Member

@mcollina mcollina left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

I needed to check the result of CITGM on v14.x-staging

@mitsos1os
Copy link
Contributor Author

Do I need anything else to prep the PR or we are good to go now?

@mcollina
Copy link
Member

cc @BethGriggs @richardlau

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

nodejs-github-bot commented Jan 26, 2021

BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2021
PR-URL: #36633
Backport-PR-URL: #36940
Fixes: #36620
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Danielle Adams <[email protected]>
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2021
PR-URL: #36633
Backport-PR-URL: #36940
Fixes: #36620
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Danielle Adams <[email protected]>
@BethGriggs
Copy link
Member

Landed in 15a16cd...5593187 (v14.x-staging)

@BethGriggs BethGriggs closed this Jan 26, 2021
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 28, 2021
PR-URL: #36633
Backport-PR-URL: #36940
Fixes: #36620
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Danielle Adams <[email protected]>
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 28, 2021
PR-URL: #36633
Backport-PR-URL: #36940
Fixes: #36620
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Danielle Adams <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

http Issues or PRs related to the http subsystem. needs-citgm PRs that need a CITGM CI run.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants