Skip to content

Revert "dgram: implicit binds should be exclusive" #279

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 10, 2015
Merged

Revert "dgram: implicit binds should be exclusive" #279

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion lib/dgram.js
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ Socket.prototype.send = function(buffer,
self._healthCheck();

if (self._bindState == BIND_STATE_UNBOUND)
self.bind({port: 0, exclusive: true}, null);
self.bind(0, null);

// If the socket hasn't been bound yet, push the outbound packet onto the
// send queue and send after binding is complete.
Expand Down
100 changes: 0 additions & 100 deletions test/parallel/test-dgram-exclusive-implicit-bind.js
View file
Open in desktop

This file was deleted.