Skip to content

Conversation

MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor

@MylesBorins MylesBorins commented Apr 12, 2017

  • Removes "experimental" warning.

This is broken out of #11207 which also included changes to the message the inspector prints.

@joshgav's authorship is maintained on the commit

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/7343/

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. dont-land-on-v4.x inspector Issues and PRs related to the V8 inspector protocol labels Apr 12, 2017
@MylesBorins MylesBorins added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Apr 12, 2017
@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @jasnell

@MylesBorins MylesBorins force-pushed the stable-inspect branch 2 times, most recently from c1a1c11 to 72f936e Compare April 12, 2017 05:38
@MylesBorins MylesBorins changed the title src: remove experiment warning for inspect src: remove experimental warning for inspect Apr 12, 2017
* Removes "experimental" warning.

Fixes: nodejs#11770
PR-URL: nodejs#12352
Reviewed-By: _tbd_
Reviewed-By: _tbd_
Copy link
Member

@jasnell jasnell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lgtm!

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Apr 12, 2017

Looks like some ci failures tho

@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor Author

Got a little overzealous removing things. Should work fine now... CI kicked off once more

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Apr 12, 2017

Remove all the things!

@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor Author

Are people ok with this landed in less than 48 hours?

Copy link
Contributor

@evanlucas evanlucas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Apr 12, 2017

I'm good with it, yes. It would be good to get this in before I do the RC.0 build

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

I personally would greatly prefer if some sort of generic URL was printed along with this change, not sure if that is standardized enough yet?

@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Fishrock123 there is another thread for changing the message, we couldn't reach consensus on that so I wanted to get this in first

jasnell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2017
* Removes "experimental" warning.

Fixes: #11770
PR-URL: #12352
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Alexey Orlenko <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Eugene Ostroukhov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ali Ijaz Sheikh <[email protected]>
@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Apr 13, 2017

Landed in a4125a3

@jasnell jasnell closed this Apr 13, 2017
cjihrig added a commit to cjihrig/node that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2017
jasnell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2017
PR-URL: #12408
Ref: #12352
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
evanlucas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2017
PR-URL: #12408
Ref: #12352
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
evanlucas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 1, 2017
PR-URL: #12408
Ref: #12352
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
evanlucas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 2, 2017
PR-URL: #12408
Ref: #12352
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@jasnell jasnell mentioned this pull request May 11, 2017
@MylesBorins MylesBorins deleted the stable-inspect branch November 14, 2017 17:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. inspector Issues and PRs related to the V8 inspector protocol
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.