Skip to content

Conversation

@LinusU
Copy link
Member

@LinusU LinusU commented May 20, 2020

Alternative approach to #37

I think that the reason that these were included in the first place was because they weren't present in upstream TypeScript at the time. This have been fixed now with: microsoft/TypeScript#36164

The drawback of this is that we are removing [Symbol.toStringTag] and toString. But if we think that it's correct to have them on the Blob I think it would be better to submit patches upstream to add that instead, since the idea behind this package is to bring Blob cross platform.

Since we haven't yet published a version with typings this would not be a breaking change!

Closes: #37

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 20, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #38 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #38   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   86.95%   86.95%           
=======================================
  Files           1        1           
  Lines          69       69           
  Branches       13       13           
=======================================
  Hits           60       60           
  Misses          9        9           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6fabfce...d87f596. Read the comment docs.

@LinusU LinusU mentioned this pull request May 20, 2020
@LinusU
Copy link
Member Author

LinusU commented May 20, 2020

Tests are failing because xo doesn't realise that Blob is defined (funny it worked with extends 😄)

edit: fixed, amended commit, and pushed

@LinusU
Copy link
Member Author

LinusU commented May 21, 2020

Thanks for the quick reviews ❤️

@LinusU LinusU merged commit bec5a3d into master May 21, 2020
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the blob-typings branch May 21, 2020 08:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants