Skip to content

DOC: expand API docs for PAR/REC #451

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 4, 2016

Conversation

grlee77
Copy link
Contributor

@grlee77 grlee77 commented Apr 30, 2016

add API documentation for the PAR/REC enhancements introduced by #409 and #427

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 95.85% when pulling 7d9c8f2 on grlee77:parrec_docstring into 9909550 on nipy:master.

``nibabel.load`` (or ``parrec.load``) should be set to ``True``. The fields
that are taken into account during sorting are:

- image_type_mr (Re, Im, Mag, Phase)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are these in the order of priority for sort?

@codecov-io
Copy link

Current coverage is 93.77%

Merging #451 into master will not change coverage

@@             master       #451   diff @@
==========================================
  Files           147        147          
  Lines         19179      19179          
  Methods           0          0          
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches       2029       2029          
==========================================
  Hits          17984      17984          
  Misses          796        796          
  Partials        399        399          

Powered by Codecov. Last updated by 9909550...7d9c8f2

@matthew-brett
Copy link
Member

Thanks - looks good.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 95.85% when pulling 94bea5a on grlee77:parrec_docstring into 9909550 on nipy:master.

@matthew-brett matthew-brett merged commit 6171942 into nipy:master May 4, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants