Closes #8054: Configurable choice fields #8090
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
wmfgerrit
pushed a commit
to wikimedia/operations-software-netbox-extras
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 15, 2022
* CableStatusChoices renamed to LinkStatusChoices - https: //github.com/netbox-community/netbox/pull/7611 * ipam.filters renamed to ipam.filtersets - netbox-community/netbox#6334 * RackGroup renamed to Location - netbox-community/netbox#5895 * ColorChoices drop as_dict function - netbox-community/netbox#8090 * add catch for when "How many Cassandra instances" not selected - https://netbox.wikimedia.org/extras/scripts/interface_automation.ProvisionServerNetwork/ Change-Id: I919f378b02a33241f69104ee9beed1104e261356
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes: #8054
FIELD_CHOICESconfiguration parameterCHOICESlistWhile this technically fills the feature request, the complete implementation should allow users to specify arbitrary colors (e.g. red, green, or blue) rather than BS5 theme classes (e.g. primary, success, info, etc.). I've opened #8089 to address that, as its scope extends beyond just the configurable choice fields.